I find this an interesting discussion. There is a strong link between recreational drugs and the dharma in the US, mainly because those interested in the dharma in the second wave of Buddhism (assuming the first was DT Suzuki), were also into doing drugs. There was a feeling that psychedelics and meditation went to the same place. Some of those who are old enough might remember Carlos Castaneda's books, which had a Yaqui shaman feeding him peyote. Those books sold millions in the US, and certainly contributed to the link between "spiritual" practice and hallucinogenics. (Of course, we later learned that these books were essentially fiction.)
I took many such drugs back in the day, and what they showed me was that there was another way of seeing things. At the time, I wasn't interested in the dharma, and it was only some years later - after I had stopped all that "recreation" - that I did discover the dharma, and was able to look at both and see that, while there were some similarities in experiences, that they did not belong together.
I think it's important to not over-exaggerate the number of people who "freak out" from acid and other drugs. This has always been government propaganda, and such cases are rare. Everyone knows someone it happened to, but anyone who did those drugs - at least back in the day - also knows dozens of people to whom such things never happened. There are certainly people who have a predisposition to psychological problems that can be exaggerated through hallucinogenics, but they are not the norm.
And, as others have said, there is much interesting medical research into these drugs. The main difference is that this research is guided (ie, people don't trip on their own), the drugs are pure, and the doses are carefully calculated. When you eat a bunch of peyote buttons, you have no idea how much active ingredient there is in them, and if you take blotter acid, you have no idea exactly what's in it, whether it's LSD or something else.
I certainly don't think there is any place for psychedelics in Zen or Theravada, and as far as I know there's no history of such things in Tibetan Buddhism (though I wouldn't be surprised if there was). I find this recent article very disturbing, and I think it's good that Brad has been so vocal about it. And those Buddhist Geek guys; they're just a bunch of wannabe gurus who latch on to the latest thing. I listened to a few episodes of their podcast - including, I think, one with Jundo - and they didn't seem to be very humble.
And I do plan to read the Michael Pollan book; I heard an interview with him, and it's quite interesting.
Gassho,
Kirk
I took many such drugs back in the day, and what they showed me was that there was another way of seeing things. At the time, I wasn't interested in the dharma, and it was only some years later - after I had stopped all that "recreation" - that I did discover the dharma, and was able to look at both and see that, while there were some similarities in experiences, that they did not belong together.
I think it's important to not over-exaggerate the number of people who "freak out" from acid and other drugs. This has always been government propaganda, and such cases are rare. Everyone knows someone it happened to, but anyone who did those drugs - at least back in the day - also knows dozens of people to whom such things never happened. There are certainly people who have a predisposition to psychological problems that can be exaggerated through hallucinogenics, but they are not the norm.
And, as others have said, there is much interesting medical research into these drugs. The main difference is that this research is guided (ie, people don't trip on their own), the drugs are pure, and the doses are carefully calculated. When you eat a bunch of peyote buttons, you have no idea how much active ingredient there is in them, and if you take blotter acid, you have no idea exactly what's in it, whether it's LSD or something else.
I certainly don't think there is any place for psychedelics in Zen or Theravada, and as far as I know there's no history of such things in Tibetan Buddhism (though I wouldn't be surprised if there was). I find this recent article very disturbing, and I think it's good that Brad has been so vocal about it. And those Buddhist Geek guys; they're just a bunch of wannabe gurus who latch on to the latest thing. I listened to a few episodes of their podcast - including, I think, one with Jundo - and they didn't seem to be very humble.
And I do plan to read the Michael Pollan book; I heard an interview with him, and it's quite interesting.
Gassho,
Kirk
Comment