If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Also now there is lab grown meat which is nothing but cells so it most definitely is not sentient. Maybe this could be the methadone of buddhist carnivores.
No animal died to make this burger. No bleating calf was separated from its mother; no manure polluted the waterways; no blood was shed on the slaughterhouse floor. But vegetarians and vegans aren’t lining up to get a mouthful just yet.On Monday, Netherlands-based researcher Mark Post served his lab-grown burger to taste testers in front of a carefully invited audience in London. He says he’s
Gassho,
Jeffrey
"I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived."
Henry David Thoreau, Walden
Honestly, I think lab grown meat is a great idea, as long as it can be developed in a way that's both healthy and economical. Aside from the ethical considerations, one of the biggest issues with raising meat for food is that it's an extremely inefficient and wasteful process. An engineered process could potentially be much more efficient.
Migrating to a lab-grown meat or meatless society would have some interesting follow-on consequences, though. For one thing, the vast majority of our domestic livestock could not survive in the wild, even if there were enough wild land to support them. We would effectively have to cull their population down over time, with the remaining few members relegated to zoos/reserves or kept as pets. I think it's quite possible this will eventually happen as our culture and technology evolves.
Last edited by delphizealot; 10-29-2014, 10:06 PM.
I agree that there is much waste when it comes to the production of meat, especially cattle. Water is a huge resource involved. I certainly don't have the answers to this, but will try to not become attached to my conclusions. Better yet, don't conclude. I'm working on a master's degree in Environmental policy and management. I love nature.
Well, I hate to kick a hornet's nest here, but I would like someone to prove to me, beyond a reasonable doubt, that plants are not 'sentient', because some of mine sure behave like they are!
Well, you could say the same about some cars.
The burden of proof lies on the one making the claim that plants are sentient. (Burden of Proof)
To quote:
An argument from ignorance occurs when either a proposition is assumed to be true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is assumed to be false because it has not yet been proven true.[1][2] This has the effect of shifting the burden of proof to the person criticizing the assertion, but is not valid reasoning.
IMHO while it is not possible to get rid of suffering completely, one can at least aim for minimisation of suffering.
If someone really needs meat for survival (e.g. because of an illness or a medical condition), then they could try to at least reduce meat consumption to a degree that is not
harmful to them. I think most people don't need to eat meat on an every day basis (but I know several people who eat it every single day!).
However, I think the vast majority of people in our western culture consume meat because they simply like its taste and not because of survival reasons. In their case it boils down to a willingness to let other sentient beings suffer (in a very, very (!) cruel way) and die just for ones own pleasure.
Of course it's up to everyone individually how they cope with that. Most meat eaters I know do this by either not thinking about the whole matter (i.e. ignoring it), or trying to find all kinds of excuses why they still eat meat (and yes, I belonged to that group before I became a vegetarian).
Anyway, I don't want to do priggish finger wagging here - I just know (from own experience, I was like that), that an awful lot of people make it too easy for themselves (and the human imagination is excellent here) when it comes to reducing or giving up their beloved meat. And yes, man, I liked the taste myself.
Does someone remember Risho asking for a recipes section (with vegetarian recipes) here on Treeleaf, during precepts study?
I'm in on this.
As this topic is raised so often, and people seem really interested to discuss it, it should not be a discussion for the intellect only, but a practical approach for the tenzo...
As soon as my personal circumstances allow, I'd love to try more vegetarian and vegan recipes.
I don't want to turn this into a cooking forum, just a small go-to thread with some favourite recipes of sangha members all over the world.
Like good friends recommend things to each other.
As no sangha member should be excluded, recipes with living plants, with animal products, with meat should all be allowed in my view.
This is not meant to disturb the discussion.
I personally could need some help with the practical approach, like good easy, fool-proof vegan recipes.
Gassho,
Danny
PS: Maybe this is nonsense. Prove to me that I'm sentient.
About the "sentient thing" - as we all know (if one is honest to oneself) this is just another excuse to justify ones own meat consumption (at least for many it is).
Grass-fed, lab grown, hydroponic, lamb or lettuce....... who speaks for the mitochondria, who some scientists consider to be their own organism residing symbiotically in all living cells??
How about our intestinal flora who are dependent on certain nutrients floating by?
Every breath I inhale some living thing. When does that incorporation become killing? Would I kill this body's cells by abstaining?
And further, isn't the whole earth a delicate organism vulnerable to "killing"? Is the earth's sentience (self-knowing) expressed thru all the many living things it contains?
And further, when is speech a form of killing?
Should I first know what is killing?
Grass-fed, lab grown, hydroponic, lamb or lettuce....... who speaks for the mitochondria, who some scientists consider to be their own organism residing symbiotically in all living cells??
How about our intestinal flora who are dependent on certain nutrients floating by?
Every breath I inhale some living thing. When does that incorporation become killing? Would I kill this body's cells by abstaining?
And further, isn't the whole earth a delicate organism vulnerable to "killing"? Is the earth's sentience (self-knowing) expressed thru all the many living things it contains?
And further, when is speech a form of killing?
Should I first know what is killing?
Does someone remember Risho asking for a recipes section (with vegetarian recipes) here on Treeleaf, during precepts study?
I'm in on this.
Originally posted by Danny B
I don't want to turn this into a cooking forum, just a small go-to thread with some favourite recipes of sangha members all over the world.
Like good friends recommend things to each other.
Yes, I just posted in that thread a little bit ago and really like the idea. Sharing recipes, however we do it, seems like a positive and productive route to me.
Originally posted by Danny B
As no sangha member should be excluded, recipes with living plants, with animal products, with meat should all be allowed in my view.
I think that would be rather lovely. Then people could share anything they like. On top of that, people could whip up alternate versions. Vegan version of so-and-so's recipe, and so on.
All recipes, all sharing, all helping, all kind to each other in it and the differences of opinion. Sounds wonderful.
Interesting article on Bill Gates's website Gatesnotes that explain how our current meat consumption rates will not be sustainable because of our exponential population growth. He also features the company, Beyond Meat, that makes "meat" out of soy beans and peas that looks, tastes and smells like real meat. In blind taste tests most people can not tell the difference.
Meat consumption worldwide has doubled in the last 20 years, and it is expected to double again by 2050. This is happening in large part because economies ar...
Comment