No Rebirth or Reincarnation?

[Jishin]

Zen master who was asked by a student, “Master, what happens after death?” He said, “I don’t know,” and the student quizzically replied, “but master you should know.” The Zen master said, “Yes, but I’m not a dead master.”

Gassho, Jishin

[Jundo]

Someone asked me to state clearly my own views on Rebirth, feeling that I am being too fuzzy. Well, here goes, but first two old Zen stories ...

One day Master Zengen went with his teacher Master Dogo to visit a house where someone had recently died to express their condolences. When they were alone, Master Zengen patted the coffin and said to Master Dogo, “Is he alive or dead?”

Master Dogo said, “I will not say alive or dead.”

Master Zengen said, “Why won’t you say?”

Master Dogo said, “I will never say. I will never say.”

Another famous Zen story, not a Koan but something to it ...

A young man asked Gasan what happened after death.
“I do not know,” said Gasan.
“But you are a Zen Master!” exclaimed the young man.
“Yes,” replied Gasan, “but I am not a dead Zen master”.

I believe that we are all of Reality in the most intimate sense, and that so long as the world goes on so do we in the most intimate sense. It is much as a single small leaf of a tree** might perceive that it is the Great Tree on which it grows in the most intimate sense and, when the day comes for that leaf to fall, another leaf comes with the Spring. However, truly so long as the Tree goes on, our lives go on beyond the little leaf. We, as single leaves, are the Tree, each branch, root and bark and all their growth. And the Tree is but the Forest, the Forest wholly the Mountains and on and on. In Ignorance, we think that we are a separate leaf, and the tree is "out there" apart from us ... human beings who see our small subjective "self" and the "not self" world. Through Zazen, the Thusness of our Treeness is realized. Leaves come and go but, so long as the Tree grows on, there is truly no loss and no coming or going.

Here is a picture. I might see a Tree without leaves. But can you show me where are the leaves but not the Tree? Try.

So, how can you show me where you are but not this living world? You are every tree, every forest, the mountains and rivers, the planets and stars. You are all such in motion. You are whatever gardener or wind blown seed planted this Tree too.

But let us turn from nature to machine ...

The Buddha taught that we are the world come together in a particular, most unusual set of circumstances resulting in our being born ... "Karmic" and environmental effects coming together, much as a particular set of grooves on a record and a needle cause one sound to be heard when played, a different set of grooves cause a different song to be heard. We are Reality playing a certain song which is our song.

I do not believe it purely chance that, against all the seeming odds that cosmic events would have turned out differently (even one left turn when we needed a right) you and I ended up born in this life now. One little furry ancestor who got eaten before reproducing ... one meteor strike in the wrong place or time ... one great-grandma who never met great-grandpa and fell in love ... and seemingly we should not be here. Our being here is very much madly ridiculous! I do not believe it primarily chance that we find ourselves in a universe with all the seeming conditions necessary for us to be here at all ... with forces and physical properties neither too strong nor too weak to have forestalled intelligent life. In fact, countless properties and paths of physics, chemistry, stellar and planetary development, biology and genetics and myriad other factors were sufficient to allow our births (sufficient when, seemingly, with one small tweak or untimely turn, such universal properties could easily have been otherwise). We are here because the history of the world, all that was needed, ran right to the doorstep of our birth.

The fact of our births seems so unlikely and (when viewed from any place in time before the happening) so highly improbable given all the seemingly endless opportunities for us to have not been born that, to my eyes, the dice are obviously loaded and a game is certainly afoot! The Tree is bound to bear leaves by its chemistry and biology such that, any leaf born upon it should not be too surprised. Nonetheless, the Tree did not have to be such a tree at all, we did not have to be these particular leaves at all ... in fact, we seemingly did not need to --be-- at all. Yet, here we are against all odds! The song-of-our-life did not simply appear burned into the CD without some harmonious composer with a sense of music ... plus the fine cut of the laser beam! Thus, I sense that there is a designing or controlling hand ... call such "God" or "Physical Principle", "Buddha" or "Big Bang Bubbling" or "Bob the Builder", for the name is not so important ... (something beyond easy understanding for our small human minds, much as ants would be hard pressed to understand the workings of the 747 they crawl upon ... but perhaps not beyond all our understanding, as we human beings are still smarter than ants!) ... that set up circumstances so conducive to life.

(Someday soon, I promise you, science will find the telltale traces of this mechanism and its running. In fact, we already are, and are already starting to see the patterns in the incredible "coming together" of factors. It is all around us. We can understand this 747!)

I believe that our being here, against all odds, is very much madly ridiculous! And, since the madly ridiculous happened once ... why not again? Such happening would be just more madly ridiculous! When the record is played again, with the same grooves, will not the same music play again? When the computer game ends and is restarted, will not the characters return to do somewhat different things in somewhat different ways? I am certain that someday our lives will be found to have been so, like characters popping in and out of some Grand Game (In fact, how would Mario feel if ... suddenly conscious ... he were to reflect on "how did I get here"? We would point to the Wii machine and Nintendo headquarters! We would point out to him that he is the the machine and the programming, and each in turn just him being played!). WE ARE MARIO!

I believe that how we play this game is vitally important. We make heavens and hells in this world by our actions ... of love and generosity, or hate and violence. Let us play this game well! Let's get it right before the quarters run out!

Is the Buddha's view of Karma like the programming to the game, the rules and restrictions which determine which characters appear in which settings, with which circumstances and abilities? Well, something has placed us in a certain setting of life, amid given circumstances with certain abilities. Was it just chance that we popped up so? It seems more likely that some pre-existing factors determined the parameters of our lives than that we just popped up here without some "pre-programming" to make it so. Thereupon, our actions now as characters in the game (Karmic Causes) determine the future course of the game and the future of our own character, perhaps including the next time our character re-emerges in the game after death when the next quarter is put in the slot (Karmic Effects).

It would not be totally unimaginable if, like Mario, we re-began the climb every time life knocked us down or out ... asking "how many lives remaining?"

That is my view. Frankly, I do not see it as so far removed from the Buddha's view some 2,500 years ago. Being a man of Ancient India, he spoke in terms of views of rebirth existing before his time. He was a man of his culture professing beliefs ... some wide and some narrow ... of his Iron Age world and societal assumptions and superstitions. I would expect that, if Buddha were expressing his Teachings today, he might instead use examples of computers and video games, modern physics and DNA. And so for the other Buddhist Teachers of the past who always spoke referencing the culture, technology and social beliefs of their times.

Anyway, that is my take.

Gassho, J

PS - ** Yes, for folks wondering, there is connection here to the origin of the "Treeleaf" name, as well as the fact that all our Sangha members are one, coming together like leaves on many distant branches joined together.

[Amelia]

Thank you Jundo.

[Jishin]

I love the video game Donkey Kong! I used to play all the time when I was a kid.

Gassho, Jishin

[Daijo]

What happen's now? That's a better question.

[Meikyo]

Thank you all for a very nice thread on a very important topic. My two cents;

I am an agnostic atheist. To me dharma is something to be utilized now and not a tool to alter some hypothetical future existence which may or may not be there. This have been said before by others and I'm just voicing my consent on that.


What I say next is not meant to offend anyone. I suspect this might be a sensitive issue since it's so fundamental for some people’s take on Buddhism. But I've chosen Treeleaf precisely because I think the vibe here is right for me to talk about stuff like this and not feel guilty for "disturbing the peace" or whatever.

Simply saying "the world and the cosmos is miraculously complex and wonderful!" is in my view not a good reason to believe anything and is not a valid argument to be as proof for any claim. All is does is reaffirm the fact that as of yet we have very little idea of what is actually doing on. It is merely an articulation of our ignorance regarding our own situation. The cavemen felt the same way when they saw a solar eclipse. That does not proof that a god ate the sun. It simply proves that we don't really know.

I'm all for the mundane principle of cause and effect. I see that at work daily. That traditional take on karma as a transcendent cosmic thing makes no sense to me at all. Maybe I haven't looked hard enough on here but it seems the implications following such a cosmic phenomenon are being overlooked.

What proof is there backing up this grand claim regarding the way your life, everybody else's life and indeed the entirety of the universe supposedly functions? If you want to have a rational discussion arguments that amount to things like "I feel it in my gut" or "I'd really wish it to be so" do not count. I can't give you (- rhetorical you. Not a specific person.) any credit for that and I hope you understand why.

Okay. Let's go with it. Let's say we're part of some cosmic game. Whether cosmic karma is the rules of the game or not it's still pretty cruel. I am made to suffer just by being here. We are then slaves of some cosmic Matrix or being. I do not wish to be a slave; to be owned or played with. I’m just here and trying to roll with life as it is. There are tribes in Africa who have never heard of the Precepts and others elsewhere who chose not take them up. Does this mean that by the rules of the game they deserve to suffer? One cannot inherit immoral actions. It is the equivalent of convicting me of a crime my distant ancestor committed. There's no way I could possibly have prevented it.

Just so with past lives. I am not involved with them and I do not remember them. How can you state that punishing me for something I did not do and could not possibly have prevented is okay? I cannot take you morally serious. It seems karma requires literal rebirth itself to be true in order to work out. In Buddhism there are no true “self” or soul. For the system to work it also requires some metaphysical repository where my moral records are stored and carried over. It must somehow be distinct from both the body and the mind since these stop at death. Can you prove that and if so how does it work? Who or what sets up the judging criteria for the morality of actions? Do we have objective moral values all of a sudden? How come they're set like that? Who gave whatever it is rights over my future existence that's still not really “me” according to Buddhism?


In conclusion: Following the reasoning of the traditional karma-doctrine as I see it is likely to lead to dark places that make no sense.
Also WAY too much thinking and missing of the point. But! It can never hurt to think an opinion properly through before deciding to adopt it or not.

Anyway. Each to his own. My big elephant in the room at Treeleaf has left.

Now the grumpy guy will go sit. Gassho all!

[Hans]

Hello,

I am not a proponent of traditional ways of presenting Karma and re-birth as some of you might know. What does strike me as interesting however is how very seldom I come across anyone who has actually deeply analysed traditional Buddhist karma models before dismissing them with modern intellectual glee.

How many of those criticising Karma can refer to sources in the Nikayas, how many have read and studied Vasubandhu's Abhidharmakosa and his Karma model?

Please don't get me wrong on this one, I'd personally (and I'm a nobody) much rather have people sit Zazen than to see them spend their time to discuss ancient philosophical "how many angels can dance on a pin" type of questions which can't be proven empirically anyhow, but what I am highlighting is the fact that with most modern Buddhist practitioners, the criticisms are often based on very superficial encounters with the actual source material. And that smacks of arrogance once in a while.

Vaibhashika views are not Madhymaka views are not Yogacara views are not necessarily Dogen's views. Do we need all these fancy words and all the historical hair splitting?

IMHO, no Shikantaza is complete in itself, but we should intimately know something before we criticise it openly.

Gassho,

Hans Chudo Mongen

[Ishin]

Thank you for this thread everyone. I personally do believe in reincarnation, but not in the conventional sense. I have decided not to get into it, because pondering it is really just a distraction to the work at hand. Right now we are here. I agree that viewing rebirth may be comforting to some in the sense that maybe we are "immortal", but for me I think I will side with Buddha's original premise that the cycle of rebirth is something to be passed over. If you want to be reborn, have you passed over it? Or are you still attached to a reason to be here or anywhere. Happy to be HERE. That is enough.

Gassho
C

[Jundo]

Simply saying "the world and the cosmos is miraculously complex and wonderful!" is in my view not a good reason to believe anything and is not a valid argument to be as proof for any claim. All is does is reaffirm the fact that as of yet we have very little idea of what is actually doing on. It is merely an articulation of our ignorance regarding our own situation. The cavemen felt the same way when they saw a solar eclipse. That does not proof that a god ate the sun. It simply proves that we don't really know.

...

What proof is there backing up this grand claim regarding the way your life, everybody else's life and indeed the entirety of the universe supposedly functions? If you want to have a rational discussion arguments that amount to things like "I feel it in my gut" or "I'd really wish it to be so" do not count. I can't give you (- rhetorical you. Not a specific person.) any credit for that and I hope you understand why.

Hi Aske,

I disagree a little bit about the structure I pointed out because I believe that, in keeping with scientific method, it consists of a set of propositions about which real evidence is obtainable and ... more vitally ... which have predictive power and may be testable.

First, as to the evidence, researchers in astro-physics, chemistry, biology (including genetics, physiology and neurology), atomic and sub-atomic physics and a great array of other fields will continue to uncover ... without a single exception ... a long and consistent string of properties and apparent "happenstances" in each of their fields which will have little to link them and no seeming necessity to have occurred in just such ways except ... without a single exception ... each was a necessary prior condition to life, intelligent life and our particular lives in the universe. From the structure of the Periodic Table to the strengths of the fundamental forces of the universe to the balances found in the planetary climate to the workings of genetics, there are endless factors which seemingly (1) could easily have been otherwise (2) need not have been how they are, yet (3) are just how they are, which happens to be the way we would need them to be for us to be sitting here arguing the question. The reason I say "without a single exception" is merely because, if there were even "a single exception" we would not be here to note the fact. Because we are here to note the fact, there cannot be a single exception.

Second, we will be able to make predictions about the properties of theorized, yet not yet discovered, properties of the universe based on nothing more than that the existence of such an yet unknown property (with very specific and narrow characteristics about it) would be necessary to our lives. Suppose, for example, there were an as yet undiscovered theoretical "Particle X" or "Force Y", with very specific properties, the existence of which is seemingly indispensable in order to allow intelligent life in the universe. Perhaps it is a Particle or Force that otherwise seems unnecessary to exist, and let us assume that the universe would be able to get on just fine in its absence. Let us further assume that, even if it did exist, it could easily have a wide range of characteristics, strengths and other properties most of which would prevent (by not being just as we need) our human existence. However, based on little more than our own existence as human beings, we will be able to predict the existence of such particles and forces with specific properties and, amazingly, such particles and forces of just such properties will be found upon search. Again and again, the universe will show itself to be just the way needed for life like ours even though, again and again, there will appear no need for it to have been so at all.

Third, a set of coincidences may just be coincidence. On the other hand, sometimes a set of coincidence proves to have a cause that make them no "coincidence" after all. In fact, the more strange and unlikely a set of coincidences, the more likely that they are not as coincidental as it seems. Imagine that one goes into a shady casino run by a fellow named "Rocko", and notices that the roulette wheel comes up 1000 times in a row on the very specific numbers and combinations of numbers that Rocko has bet for himself. Rocko wins spin after spin after spin then, moving over to the Blackjack table, he wins every single deal of cards there too. Well, it could just be a line of coincidences (after all, some numbers need to come up, so why not those?). However, at a certain point and looking at the overall situation, I would start to suppose that magnets in the roulette wheel and loaded decks were a more likely explanation. It could just be chance, but it could also just as easily (in fact, much more easily after a certain point) be a cheat. Sure enough, on a search, I might discover just such a mechanism.

Well, how much more amazing is our human birth, the equivalent of winning every single turn of the wheel and hand of cards (without one exception) needed for our births, at every crossroads of history and natural events for 13.7 Billion years? While it may all be chance and "just the way the ball bounced", a better explanation is the equivalent of "cosmic magnets and loaded biological decks". There may be a mechanism to explain why the ball bounced so strangely and, if there is a mechanism, it may be theorized about, tested for and perhaps discovered (much as we have done for countless previously unknown mechanisms which science has found).

What I am proposing is, perhaps, the first set of "religious" claims about the original of mankind and our connection to the universe which might actually be testable and explainable, not to mention seem (unlike a lot of the fantasy that appears in religious myth and dogma) to actually describe how the world really seems to work.

Gassho, J

[Jundo]

Someone wrote me for my "best take" on why ... if the universe is so specially hospitable for our lives as I describe ... we still live in a world of wars, cancer and other diseases, children born with all manner of defects and the like.

Traditionally, Buddhists might argue that children born with defects were just "paying the price" for some Karmic debt from a prior life. Christians might suppose that there was some mysterious "God's Plan" at work.

Either of those could be the reason. Or, it could all just be what happens, random nature and bad luck. But I offer a fourth proposition, and furthermore, it is a proposition very much in keeping with both modern scientific discoveries and traditional Buddhist views of causation and freedom of human action.

I believe that our lives manifested in the universe because some mechanism has guided the events and properties of physics, chemistry, biology and all the rest in the direction necessary for life, intelligent life and maybe our very human lives (as evidenced by human life arising as the outcome of an amazing series of prior circumstances and seeming happenstances). It is possible that there are certain laws, mechanisms, physical properties, restrictions and the like which guided universal events into just such a direction (as evidenced by us sitting here discussing the matter despite/as the seemingly hyper-unlikely outcome).

As anyone who has a garden or farm field is well aware, various very restrictive factors of biology such as seed structure, soil and weather restrict what will grow in the garden and when. One cannot get apples from tomato seeds. Tomatoes grow, not by random chance, but because a gardener or farmer (a mechanism) place tomato seeds onto the ground and water is added. If one plants tomato seeds, tends and waters, it is no surprise at all that tomatoes, and not apples, will appear in the garden a few weeks later precisely where the seeds were placed. The growing of the tomatoes is not a totally random event, but an event brought about by the gardener's choices and the nature of the seeds.

Nonetheless, though the growth of tomatoes themselves proves to be a determined outcome given that tomato seeds were planted and tended, still, the actual tomatoes which appear ... big and little, round or strangely shaped, healthy or deformed, tasty or bitter etc. ... demonstrate a great deal of randomness and variety within the parameters. The universe seems to grow things based on a shotgun process, by which some of the growth of the garden will run very wild. Despite the gardener's best efforts, nature does not always turn out "perfect" crops each time and, unfortunately, I believe that something similar happens with children in the womb too. Likewise with our human bodily cells which grow and divide according to very restricted and mechanical principles, yet with sufficient freedom to have the potential to sometimes run amuck as cancer. Nature sometimes "miscopies" a chromosome, hits a dead end or runs wild.

Turning from nature to machines again ...

Assuming that there are limiting laws and mechanisms which somehow made our human births somehow more than pure dumb luck, nonetheless, there is also found amazing freedom of behavior and randomness of outcome within the confines of those limitations. In other words, something may have led to our births as "loaded dice", but once born we choose and act with a degree of free will and autonomy. To return to MARIO: The parameters of the game are written in the program ... what the characters can and cannot do is subject to various restrictions, and when the characters will appear in the game may also be part of the program. However, once a character appears in the game, there is a surprising amount of freedom and flexibility to what MARIO and the other characters can do, the directions they may head, the "choices" they can make. If anyone has every played an urban simulation game called "Simcity", the parameters within the programming are very narrow and restrictive about how the game is played. However, within the confines of those restrictions, countless choices and patterns are possible in designing one's unique city ...



Again, if such a mechanism exists in such way, I think that someday soon we may be able to test for it. The code underlying our "Simcity" will not always be hidden from sight.

War, violence and the harms we do to each other within this "video game we call 'this life'" are also matters of free choice, just as some games ... within certain parameters ... allow all manner of violence, greed and mayhem (as anyone who has ever played an unfortunate game like "Grand Theft Auto" can experience).



So, as the Buddha taught ... I think the world is bound by causation, yet simultaneously very free. And, thus, we find ourselves in this world with freedom enough to make a violent and greedy mess of things should we wish.

Are my propositions silly? Well, no more silly than what one might find in the Tibetan Book of the Dead or Book of Genesis. But, in contrast, I feel that what I describe is so much closer to how the world can be seen and experienced to work with our own eyes, and the propositions may even be testable and demonstrable.

Gassho, J

[Rich]

Hi Aske, just want to mention that there are human repositories like the genes and mind-body habits and reflexes which for better or worse control us. But the good news is that with practice a certain presence can be developed to enable us to change if change is required. And I'm still working on that - the practice and the change.



Kind regards. /\

[TimF]

Awesome teaching! Many thanks for using the tree and its leaves to help clarify this. Helps me to see the path through the woods

After further thought, I am going to edit this and give my take on birth and death...please remember that this is only my opinion.

I believe that karma fits in to the "birth" and "death" of us in each moment. I am not the same as I was yesterday, and I will not be the same as I am today tomorrow - therefore I am "born" and "die" in each moment.

My actions before my new "birth" (this moment) can affect this moment, and can also affect me after my "death" (the end of this moment). For example - if I choose to rob a blind man, then karma may very well catch up with me and affect my "re-birth" in another moment - or many moments for that matter (how about 15-20 in the slammer!). Or, let's say I choose to abuse drugs - this could very well have a lasting affect on my future "re-births", and cause my "karma" to be "bad". The opposite, I believe, can be true for the good choices we make.

As far as what happens to the "self" when the body finally gives in -whether from old age, accident, or disease - is something I do not know, nor do I believe any of us knows. So, with this in mind, I choose to live in this moment and not dwell on that which I do not know.

Gassho,
Tim

[Amelia]

Nice, Tim

[Jundo]

Awesome teaching! Many thanks for using the tree and its leaves to help clarify this. Helps me to see the path through the woods

After further thought, I am going to edit this and give my take on birth and death...please remember that this is only my opinion.

I believe that karma fits in to the "birth" and "death" of us in each moment. I am not the same as I was yesterday, and I will not be the same as I am today tomorrow - therefore I am "born" and "die" in each moment.

My actions before my new "birth" (this moment) can affect this moment, and can also affect me after my "death" (the end of this moment). For example - if I choose to rob a blind man, then karma may very well catch up with me and affect my "re-birth" in another moment - or many moments for that matter (how about 15-20 in the slammer!). Or, let's say I choose to abuse drugs - this could very well have a lasting affect on my future "re-births", and cause my "karma" to be "bad". The opposite, I believe, can be true for the good choices we make.

As far as what happens to the "self" when the body finally gives in -whether from old age, accident, or disease - is something I do not know, nor do I believe any of us knows. So, with this in mind, I choose to live in this moment and not dwell on that which I do not know.

Gassho,
Tim

Hi Tim,

This is my way of seeing too.

But I would like to point out one kind of "rebirth" and "reaping of Karmic effects after the 'body finally gives in" that we might learn to see even if skeptical of many views of "rebirth".

Go back to the tree and leaves ...

Pick one to represent yourself. Now show me where where is your particular leaf but not the Tree? Try.

You cannot. (You may point to parts of the tree that seem not to be the leaf, but you cannot point to your leaf without pointing to the tree). That is because, while you are you (leaf is leaf), the tree is also what you are in the most intimate sense (leaf is tree). You are 100% tree. And so are all the other leaves, the bark, the sap and wood and roots. In the Mahayana Buddhist view of interpenetration and mutual-identity, you are the tree in the most intimate sense ... all the rest is tree in the most intimate sense ... and ultimately since all is tree, all is you too in the most intimate sense.

But we "human being" leaves have some special properties, making us very special leaves with some amazing abilities: First, we are sentient beings who are conscious and self-aware (in fact, we are 'self-aware' in a way by which our brains tend to divide our self-identity as being separate and independent from the "not me rest of the tree". We think there are basically two subject/object categories in the world: "me" and "everything else." Much of Zen Practice is to re-unite ourselves mentally with the "just who we are all along" tree and all it contains which we falsely think is somehow "not me, apart, out there and kinda scary").

Next, our actions impact the tree and all it contains ... in some ways right to the root (modern physics tells us that our every movement and action has some impact and force which reaches ... however subtly ... right to the farthest reaches of the cosmos, much like tugging on one corner of an ordinary bed sheet will cause some change ... however subtly ... at the far reaches, so it is even light years away). But our actions most directly and strongly impact all the neighboring leaves that share one's branch. Let us look at our planet and society as "our branch" filled with all the other "human leaves" with which we share this world. The violence we do can scar and maim our "branch" of society and the fellow humans with which we share it, the pollution and excess consumption driven by greed can damage or destroy our planet, the bow to which we cling for life. Likewise, love and caring can make a better society, and nurturing of this planet can make a more healthful environment for the future ... much like watering and nurturing our corner of the tree. Our actions ... whether of greed, anger and ignorance or of generosity, peace, moderation and wholeness ... have effects that may last well after our little leafs (you and me) seem to tumble from the branch when (in your words) "this body finally gives in".

That is all true.

But now recall that you are the tree in the most intimate sense, as well as all the other leaves in the most intimate sense. You are even the little leaf which will come to "take your place" on the branch when spring comes, and you are so in the most intimate sense. It is Tree and so are you and you are it. (To emphasize: I do not mean simply that "we all share a common branch or are parts of the same tree with other parts. Rather I mean that, from one beautiful perspective, they are you and you just that.).

Thus, in such way, it can be said that your good and bad actions in this life will impact and be felt as the "you" who will appear on the branch in the future, long after this "leaf" you are now drifts to the ground. You actions will also impact all the other leaves of the branch, and they are you too (and you they). Your actions now are bound to be felt in your future lives on this planet!

BY THE WAY, let me explain what is going on with these posts in this thread by me (especially for folks who may be wondering where all this is coming from):

I have been interested for a long time in seeing if any aspects of traditional Buddhist views of "rebirth" can be salvaged and re-expressed in ways perfectly compatible with the views and methods of modern science. I believe some can, as I am trying to present here. Although many aspects of traditional interpretations of rebirth are hard to salvage (often even silly) and seem to me nothing more than fantasy and creative religious imaginings, there are perspectives by which we can see that ... like the leaves on the tree ... you and I "continue on" with the totality which we are, share self-identity with all other things in the cosmos, and our actions have effects which impact all of it ... including the "future us's" which will someday spring from its branches. I do not think it necessary to "throw out the Baby Buddha with the bathwater" on the subject of "post-mortem rebirth".

Furthermore, most of the ideas I present are NOT original to me, even though I am speaking in modern terms of "video games" and such. In fact, they are based on Teachings of Mahayana Buddhism which have been for centuries and remain vital to Zen Buddhism, including our Dogen ... the Teachings of "Hua-yen" or the "Flower Garland".

The teaching [of the Hua-yen School] maintains the interdependence and equality of all appearance, the ‘teaching of totality’. Appearances may be in different states, but they are necessarily interdependent in constituting the universe of phenomena, and in equally manifesting the Buddha-illumination of enlightenment.

...

The basic idea of the Avatamsaka [Flower Garland] Sutra is the unity of the absolute and the relative: All in One, One in All. The All melts into a single whole. There are no divisions in the totality of reality ... the cosmos viewed as holy, as "one bright pearl," the universal reality of the Buddha."

...

When Fazang [one of the principle Teachers of the school] first lectured on the Flower Garland Sutra ...he used metaphors such as Indra’s Net of Jewels and the Golden Lion. ....

A frequently cited expression of this vision of reality is the simile of Indra’s Net from the Avatamsaka Sutra, which was further elaborated by the Huayan teachers. The whole universe is seen as a multidimensional net. At every point where the strands of the net meet, jewels are set. Each jewel reflects the light reflected in the jewels around it, and each of those jewels in turn reflects the light from all the jewels around them, and so on, forever. In this way, each jewel, or each particular entity or event, including each person, ultimately reflects and expresses the radiance of the entire universe. All of totality can be seen in each of its parts.

Fazang [further] llustrated the Huayan teachings for Empress Wu by constructing a hall of mirrors, placing mirrors on the ceiling, floor, four walls, and four corners of a room. In the center he placed a Buddha image with a lamp next to it. Standing in this room, the empress could see that the reflection in any one mirror clearly reflected the reflections from all of the other mirrors, including the specific reflection of the Buddha image in each one. This fully demonstrated the unobstructed interpenetration of the particular and the totality, with each one contained in all, and with all contained in each one. Moreover, it showed the nonobstructed interpenetration of each particular mirror with each of the others.

Such Teachings of Interpenetration and Mutual Identity were at the heart of Master Dogen's worldview, such as in his Teaching of the One Bright Pearl ...

All the universe is one bright pearl—we do not speak of two pearls or three pearls. The whole body is one right Dharma eye. The whole body is the Real body. The whole body is One Expression. The whole body is light. The whole body is Mind in its totality. When it is the whole body, the whole body knows no hindrance. Everywhere is perfectly round, turning over, rolling smoothly. ....

Thus, though its face seems to keep on changing, turning, and stopping, it is one bright pearl. Knowing that one bright pearl is indeed like this—that is one bright pearl. The colorations and configurations of one bright pearl are encountered in this manner. When it is thus, there is no reason to worry that you are not one bright pearl because in confusion you think, “I am not the pearl.” Worrying and doubting, grasping and rejection, action and inaction are all but temporary views of small measure. Moreover, this is only one bright pearl appearing as small-scale notions.

Should we not cherish such infinite colorations and brilliance? Each of the many facets of its radiant variegations are the quality of the entire universe—who can take them away? There is no one casting a tile in the marketplace. Do not trouble yourself about not falling into or not being blind to the cause and effect of mundane existence. Being essentially unobscured from first to last, one bright pearl is the original face and the enlightened eye.

http://dharmafield.org/resources/tex...-bright-pearl/

Gassho, J

[Peacemouse]

On origins, I find that one is actually perfectly capable of holding both positions if one discards the notion that 'random chance' and 'not random chance' are mutually exclusive positions. They are, indeed - or at least can be - complementary views.

It might be interesting to examine the reasons why one feels the need to grasp too tightly to either of these views.

Chet