I thought I would start a new thread on this within the Zazen discussion because it felt more appropriate. I hope it's Ok to begin with a quote from Pontus
that made me think.
'In an internet Sangha, unless we spend a lot of time in Dokusan, talking about our private life and practice with the teacher, it is hard for him to know for sure how real of a deal we are. That is the drawback with an internet Sangha. It's an experiment, a process, breaking new ground. '
It has never occured to me to approach Taigu or Jundo for a individual talk because I understand that this time (which must be restricted considering the commitments that Jundo and Taigu have outside of Treeleaf) is for very sensitive matters/emergencies. I agree with Pontus that this makes it difficult
for a teacher to judge a members commitment but I also experience another side to this.
I turned Taigu's comment around and asked myself does Treeleaf deliver the 'real deal' for me. Not meeting a person in the flesh is definately a drawback. Treeleaf has quite a lot of members - a quick turnover in posts/subjects. At times it's hard to feel an authentic connection because it's like throwing an idea/thought/question out into an empty room. It's lovely when someone responds - but sometimes there is no response. This is also understandable - it isn't possible to reply to every post - or necessary or appropriate to always expect some reply. But sometimes I'm left with the feeling 'was that a dumb or uninteresting thing to say?' In face to face conversation it's easier to judge all of this.
Occasionally Jundo or Taigu will add an encouraging response (or constructive criticism!) and that is always welcome - because then it feels real - like 'yes, I do have a teacher' - but I'm in awe at the number of posts they have to read through - and obviously they can't give out individual responses all the time.
So really - though I'm deeply appreciative of this sangha - there is also a sense of loss and wanting it (quite unrealistically) to be more. But I do show up as much as I can - and my practice has deepened considerably as a result. And I do appreciate the input of sangha members.
At the end of the day we have to be our own judge of all this - I hope some sincerity shows through - but I'm taking more than I'm giving - and I'd like to think that the taking from here shows up as 'giving' elsewhere.
Gassho
Willow
that made me think.
'In an internet Sangha, unless we spend a lot of time in Dokusan, talking about our private life and practice with the teacher, it is hard for him to know for sure how real of a deal we are. That is the drawback with an internet Sangha. It's an experiment, a process, breaking new ground. '
It has never occured to me to approach Taigu or Jundo for a individual talk because I understand that this time (which must be restricted considering the commitments that Jundo and Taigu have outside of Treeleaf) is for very sensitive matters/emergencies. I agree with Pontus that this makes it difficult
for a teacher to judge a members commitment but I also experience another side to this.
I turned Taigu's comment around and asked myself does Treeleaf deliver the 'real deal' for me. Not meeting a person in the flesh is definately a drawback. Treeleaf has quite a lot of members - a quick turnover in posts/subjects. At times it's hard to feel an authentic connection because it's like throwing an idea/thought/question out into an empty room. It's lovely when someone responds - but sometimes there is no response. This is also understandable - it isn't possible to reply to every post - or necessary or appropriate to always expect some reply. But sometimes I'm left with the feeling 'was that a dumb or uninteresting thing to say?' In face to face conversation it's easier to judge all of this.
Occasionally Jundo or Taigu will add an encouraging response (or constructive criticism!) and that is always welcome - because then it feels real - like 'yes, I do have a teacher' - but I'm in awe at the number of posts they have to read through - and obviously they can't give out individual responses all the time.
So really - though I'm deeply appreciative of this sangha - there is also a sense of loss and wanting it (quite unrealistically) to be more. But I do show up as much as I can - and my practice has deepened considerably as a result. And I do appreciate the input of sangha members.
At the end of the day we have to be our own judge of all this - I hope some sincerity shows through - but I'm taking more than I'm giving - and I'd like to think that the taking from here shows up as 'giving' elsewhere.
Gassho
Willow
Comment