If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
When I find myself thinking, "Wow, this is awesome!" or, "it's like being everything and nothing," while sitting, whatever is being experienced is immediately interrupted by the examination of it. By examining with a discriminating mind, I take myself out of the flow. That's not quite true of course, since there is no out of the flow or in the flow lol. It's like if I think, "I haven't thought of the past this whole time," I am actually thinking of the past while pondering that lol. Usually "I" just let it be like a house with two windows open, letting the breeze blow through. Sometimes the breeze is turbulent, other times it isn't even noticeable, either way can't cling to it or push it away; a beneficial mindset to allow both on and off the zafu since, of course, zazen is timeless.
So all the commentaries, all the suttas all pointing in the wrong direction? No need for Jhana, Vipassana, Satipattana because all we need to do is merely sit and accept things just as they are?
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Hah, well, the Zen and other "Great Vehicle/Mahayana" Buddhists for 1 or 2000 years have been talking about the place of so-called "Lesser Vehicle/Hinayana" practices (no longer a PC term, by the way). The most typical conclusion is that the Buddha preached in different ways to different folks with different levels of understanding or needs ... all "expedient means" ... much as a physician prescribes different medicines to different patients. Personally, I read a middle-length Sutta each morning and find little contradiction, although differences in approach and expression.
Something interesting about Jhana is that Shikantaza is very much resonant of the so-called "Fourth Jhana" (the one the Buddha recommended as the ultimate path in this world) as described in the old Suttas. I have written about this before.
A book that should be mentioned is the recent "The Experience of Samadhi" by Richard Shankman, a survey of historical and modern Theravadan interpretations of Samadhi and Jhana. What is particularly interesting in reading the book is the extent of disagreement and widely varied interpretations from teacher to teacher, Sri Lankan vs. Burmese vs. Thai vs. Westerners, Lineage to Lineage even in that neck of the Buddhist world. Here is a Buddhistgeeks interview the author gave ... and as he discusses, there is little agreement, either currently or in centuries past, among the South Asian traditions either about "what the Buddha taught", or at least, how to interpret "what the Buddha taught" on the subject of Jhana. In the book, he interviews about two dozen teachers in South Asian traditions, and gets about two dozen, often very dissimilar interpretations.
We continue our discussion with insight meditation teacher and author, Richard Shankman. In this episode we continue to dissect the different kinds of samadhi and their respective fruits--what in the Theravada tradition are called jhana (or "meditative absorption"). According to Shankman there are two ways of approaching the attainment of jhana, one as was taught in the original canonical texts of the Theravada, the Pali Suttas, and the other from the later commentaries on the Buddha's teachings, the Vishudimagga. As a result we get two different forms of jhana--one called Sutta jhana and the other called Vishudimagga jhana. ...
Richard Shankman's book makes one very interesting point that, perhaps, can be interpreted to mean that practices such as Shikantaza and the like actually cut right to the summit of Jhana practice. You see, it might perhaps be argued (from some interpretations presented in the book) that Shikantaza practice is very close to what is referred to as the "Fourth Jhana in the Suttas" ... as opposed to the highly concentrated, hyper-absorbed Visuddhimagga commentary version. The Fourth Jhana in the Pali Suttas was considered the 'summit' of Jhana practice (as the higher Jhana, No. 5 to 8, were not encouraged as a kind of otherworldly 'dead end') and appears to manifest (quoting the sutta descriptions in the book) "an abandoning of pleasure, pain, attractions/aversions, a dropping of both joy and grief", a dropping away of both rapture and bliss states, resulting in a "purity of mindfulness" and "equanimity". Combine this with the fact that, more than a "one pointed mind absorbed into a particular object", there is a "unification of mind" (described as a broader awareness around the object of meditation ... whereby the "mind itself becomes collected and unmoving, but not the objects of awareness, as mindfulness becomes lucid, effortless and unbroken" (See, for examples. pages 82-83 here))
Dharma practice comprises a wide range of wise instructions and skillful means. As a result, meditators may be exposed to a diversity of approaches to the core teachings and the meditative path—and that can be confusing at times. In this clear and accessible exploration, Dharma teacher and longtime meditator Richard Shankman unravels the mix of differing, sometimes conflicting, views and traditional teachings on how samadhi (concentration) is understood and taught. In part one, Richard Shankman explores the range of teachings and views about samadhi in the Theravada Pali tradition, examines different approaches, and considers how they can inform and enrich our meditation practice. Part two consists of a series of interviews with prominent contemporary Theravada and Vipassana (Insight) Buddhist teachers. These discussions focus on the practical experience of samadhi, bringing the theoretical to life and offering a range of applications of the different meditation techniques.
A bit of the discussion of the highest (in Buddhist Practice) "Fourth Jhana", and its emphasis on equanimity while present amid circumstances (and a dropping of bliss states), can be found on page 49.
This is very close to a description of Shikantaza, for example, as dropping all aversions and attractions, finding unification of mind, collected and unmoving, effortless and unbroken, in/as/through/not removed from the life, circumstances, complexities which surround us and are us, sitting still with what is just as it is.
Likewise, most Zen folks will say that Zazen practice manifests and brings to life BOTH traditional wings of the Buddhist bird of Samantha and Vipassana ...
Buddhist Practice is usually described as flying upon the twin wings of Samatha (calming thoughts and emotions, illuminating and dropping body-mind) and awareness and understanding of Vipassana (insight and awareness primarily into the nature and workings of 'self' and mental functions). That is true in Zen practice no less than most other forms of Buddhist practice.
In a nutshell, Vipassana might be described as insights and awareness, based on Buddhist psychology, as to how the mind works and plays it games. It is an understanding of the Skandhas (form, sensation, perception, mental formation, consciousness ... those words always sung in the Heart Sutra), how our thoughts and emotional reactions arise, how we label and divide the world. We should also understand the Buddha's ideas about how suffering arises within us, which is intimately tied to all that.
However, unlike some schools of Buddhism, in Shikantaza we do not pursue any particular practices --during-- Zazen itself in order to cultivate such vipassana insight ... and much insight naturally arises from Zazen as "Zazen does its thing". Perhaps we might say that, just in "just sitting" Shikantaza ... dropping thoughts of this and that, thus quieting the mind's "mind games" ... we develop a natural sensitivity and understanding of the mind's "mind games" (much like one first comes to really appreciate what "urban noise" is when one first drives out of the city to the middle of the desert or some other truly quiet place).
Off the cushion too, we can learn to bring Shikantaza out into the world, learning to release thoughts and emotions which arise without being trapped by them.
And, apart from "on the Zafu" sitting times, it is also good to develop some insight and insight into the "mind's games", and come to identify the workings of the Skandhas and such within us day to day.
For example, if you feel an angry or jealous thought arising within you during your day, it is very helpful to identify that as a "bit of temporary mind theatre" and "just the self judging and conflicting with another perceived self". That gives us some distance from the passing emotion, and we no longer see the emotion as quite as inevitable and "true" as we might have before.
For example, in the case of anger ... We need to develop a sensitivity to how anger arises within us, the triggers which tend to set it off, the first feeling of it starting to arise and the cycle it follows until vanishing. We need to catch ourself more and develop the ability to say, "I am feeling the emotion of anger now, but it is only the mind created theater which is present in this moment ... it need not be so." We need to see it as a story the self writes for itself, "catch it" and thus not be "sucked in" and fooled as much. (Most people who feel anger do not realize it is just a mind created bit of theater which can be replaced by something else ... it is not the way things "have to be". E.g., most people think, when they become upset, that they have "reason to be upset, and it is true and justified", not an optional response to the circumstances). That realization and understanding of how our inner theater works is a step to developing the ability to "rewrite and change the story" at will.
When I find myself thinking, "Wow, this is awesome!" or, "it's like being everything and nothing," while sitting, whatever is being experienced is immediately interrupted by the examination of it. By examining with a discriminating mind, I take myself out of the flow. That's not quite true of course, since there is no out of the flow or in the flow lol. It's like if I think, "I haven't thought of the past this whole time," I am actually thinking of the past while pondering that lol. Usually "I" just let it be like a house with two windows open, letting the breeze blow through. Sometimes the breeze is turbulent, other times it isn't even noticeable, either way can't cling to it or push it away; a beneficial mindset to allow both on and off the zafu since, of course, zazen is timeless.
Gassho, Foolish John
When we sit and think "Wow, this is awesome", this sitting-life is Awesome. And when we sit and don't think ""Wow, this is awesome", this sitting-life is still Awesome.
However, it is best for us to just sit without thinking ""Wow, this is awesome", or getting caught in any other trains of thought, because doing so may blind us to the realization of this "Awesome".
Ultimately, however, in Shikantaza there is a certain Awesome Illumination, a Silence (Big "S"), that shines right through and right as both thoughts or the absence of thoughts ... what we call "thinking not thinking". It is a Silence that is heard in silence (small "s"), it is a Silence that is heard as life's greatest noise. Nonetheless, in Shikantaza, one usually sits dropping the noise of thoughts until one can "tune into" this Silence that is not a matter of silence or noise.
In fact, even this "Big A" Awesome of "Big E" Enlightenment is not a matter of human judgments of "awesome" or "ordinary", sacred vs. mundane, enlightenment vs. delusion. It is the Awesome Illumination which shines behind/between/beyond/right as all of that. Nonetheless, one must generally live with a head free of delusion in order to realize so ... thus we sit Shikantaza, dropping our thoughts and judgments.
The great Koan Introsprection Zazen Teacher Koun Yamada of the Sanbokyodan wrote ...
Shedding delusion and enlightenment, transcending sacred and profane.
We are talking here about transcending the world of dualistic opposition. The world of everyday common sense is always the world of dualistic opposition in terms of subject and object, self and other, delusion and enlightenment, holy and ordinary, right and wrong, good and bad, long and short. These are all products of dualistic opposition. But to the background to those pairs (although “background” is perhaps not the best term), there is the world of emptiness. Although they are in opposition to each other, they are at the same time one. To give an example, imagine painting a picture on a canvas. You apply different colors to the pure white canvas. We do not readily realize that the canvas is white. Rather than the white, it is the world of color or form that we clearly see. We do not see “the world of white.” I would like to bring you all to a direct experience of that world of white, not just as a concept. To say “shedding delusion and enlightenment” does not mean that they are not there. Precisely where there is delusion and enlightenment there is nothing. In the oft-cited Heart Sutra this is expressed in the lines: “Form is emptiness, emptiness is form.”
The same goes for transcending sacred and profane. “Sacred” here can be understood as all the Buddhas and patriarchs, in particular the Buddhas, of which there are very many. These are usually considered to be quite separate entities from us. We make a clear division between such saints or sages and ordinary people. We feel that there is a clearly defined difference between such holy ones and ordinary people. But when we view things from the basis of “the world of white,” so to speak, they are the same. This is also found in the Hotsuganmon that we just recited together prior to this teisho:
Before enlightenment ancient buddhas were the same as us.
After enlightenment we will be exactly as those ancient ones
All I might add is that our ultimate purpose is not simply to realize a white, blank canvas. A painting which is a white, blank canvas is not really a painting, just lifeless wood and cloth filled with possibility. Life is all the creation and colors of the canvas we paint, which we come to realize was inseparable from the canvas all along. If we stripped off all the paints simply to remain with an empty (small "e") canvas, we would destroy the painting. On the other hand, if we get lost in the illusions, emotions and complexity of the painted images, we do not realize what it truly is ... Emptyness (Big E) that is beyond and right through "full" or "empty" ... the White which, like white light through a prism, shines as all the colors. The painting is the canvas is the painting ... the Light contains and is white, black, blue, red, green, yellow and all the rest ...
Nonetheless ... though the painting is always Enlghtenment itself, always Buddha ... when we paint the canvas of our life and world, let us do our best to make a beautiful picture free of ugliness, more enlightened and less filled with delusion. In Practice-Enlightenment, our very act of painting our life ... in this moment, with this stroke of the brush and this ... makes the painting in each moment.
I actually found the talk so so, and a little too focused on "cutting the thinking process" rather than illuminating and "seeing through" the thinking process (thinking-non-thinking ... paint and canvas, not two ... thus not being a prisoner of thoughts even while thinking) ... it is really a bit of both, "cutting" thoughts of excess greed, anger, division, and "seeing through" all our thoughts ... but I did like this part:
I was reading a biography about a Hsing I master, and he made a statement that in my mind expresses the essence of Dogen's practice of enlightenment. The Hsing I master's one-liner is this: "Instead of trying to achieve it, pretend you already have it. This will help your mind." This is the idea: when you sit in zazen you are not awaiting enlightenment or awaiting satori. If you carry the idea of enlightenment in your mind, you are a million miles away. One inch equals a million miles out there somewhere, and inevitably you will be off track. You must come to a final conclusion. Resolve all paradoxes in your mind and sit with absolute faith in the efficacy of zazen. It is very difficult to understand, but this encapsulates the statement that enlightenment and practice are one. This is how you sit in zazen. Instead of trying to achieve something, act as though you already have it. So now you are practicing enlightenment. Get it?
if you think that one HAS TO feel "that's it" for it to be "it", then it is not "it". But if one sits right through and beyond "that's it" or "not it" ... THAT'S IT ... and we may sometimes even know so. But known or not ... IT is ALWAYS IT! To just sIT is IT.
Last night while sitting I started getting a weird feeling. Thought to myself,"man this feels great. This is IT" Then I realized that my eyes were closed and I was slowly falling asleep. It wasn't it. It wasn't not it, but it definitely wasn't it. Wait that was it.... nope missed it. Shoot, back to just sitting.
Gassho from the sleepy time sitter
If I'm already enlightened why the hell is this so hard?
Great thread everyone. I've really been enjoying it. I have no wisdom to offer, but thought I'd share a little personal anecdote.
I find that a round of sitting is filled with hundreds (probably thousands) of moments of letting go. I have my personal favorite obsessions (anxiety about sickness, family, and money), but we all have our own different favorites I suspect. What a relief to see them (hopefully before following them for too long) and let go. Away they go, at least for a few seconds, and then they (or their relations) are back and around and around it goes.
Sometimes that open awareness remains for a little longer, and then this fella I call "The Storyteller" or "The Minstrel" will often appear and begin spinning a story about "what a great experience" I am having on the cushion and even starts helping me compose a post for Treeleaf all about it (I wish I were joking). But then I catch him and return to open awareness, but milliseconds later he re-appears, spinning a new tale about how I was having a great experience until The Storyteller appeared and started spinning a story about it... And on and on.
What a beautiful mess we are with our fancy central nervous systems, and what a precious jewel this practice is.
Every moment of open awareness is a treasure. Every stray thought released is practice. Every appearance of The Storyteller is both our delusion and how we move in the world as human beings.
Gassho,
Sekishi
Sekishi | 石志 | He/him | Better with a grain of salt, but best ignored entirely.
Sometimes Zazen is quiet & still and sometimes not. However, Zazen is ALWAYS the Silence and Stillness that encompasses both silence and noise, stillness and motion. Sometimes the noise and motion hide the Silence and Stillness, and make them hard to perceive. No matter, because the Silence and Stillness are ALWAYS so whether known or not. Nice to know silence and stillness ... but better to witness the Silence and Stillness (Big S) that are not dependent on silence and stillness, their perception or not.
Great thread everyone. I've really been enjoying it. I have no wisdom to offer, but thought I'd share a little personal anecdote.
I find that a round of sitting is filled with hundreds (probably thousands) of moments of letting go. I have my personal favorite obsessions (anxiety about sickness, family, and money), but we all have our own different favorites I suspect. What a relief to see them (hopefully before following them for too long) and let go. Away they go, at least for a few seconds, and then they (or their relations) are back and around and around it goes.
Sometimes that open awareness remains for a little longer, and then this fella I call "The Storyteller" or "The Minstrel" will often appear and begin spinning a story about "what a great experience" I am having on the cushion and even starts helping me compose a post for Treeleaf all about it (I wish I were joking). But then I catch him and return to open awareness, but milliseconds later he re-appears, spinning a new tale about how I was having a great experience until The Storyteller appeared and started spinning a story about it... And on and on.
What a beautiful mess we are with our fancy central nervous systems, and what a precious jewel this practice is.
Every moment of open awareness is a treasure. Every stray thought released is practice. Every appearance of The Storyteller is both our delusion and how we move in the world as human beings.
Gassho,
Sekishi
Sekishi, thank you for this post and for your honesty. You are not the only one, my "storyteller" reappears all the time, spinning stories and Treeleaf posts, fb statues etc. etc. Your thoughts here are just wonderful!!
Comment