Re: Even in Zen, God agrees with us.
Hey everyone,
I genuinely care for the people in this dialogue, and I am aware of the history. With regard to the present thread -
There are several conversations going on here -
1) Chugai's posting links to stong and graphic material -
2) Chet, Jundo, and Taigu going back and forth regarding Zen and individual identity, balanced view, displays of violence used to illustrate a point, etc.
3) People trying to discusss the underlying substantive issues to defuse the emotional discourse/content, and the example of the "tough love" teaching method...
I do not want to engage on the substance of the issues - (an unaccustomed position for me to take) - but rather - ask all involved to check themselves by asking a few questions:
1) Is my speech skillful?
2) Is my speech compassionate?
3)Is my speech honest?
4)How will my speech be received by the person I am addressing? What is the point I want them to hear?
There are important issues in this thread that deserve to be discussed to everyone's benefit -
This goes for all of us - in this case we are all teachers and all students - we are all here because we realize that suffering and pain exist in the world. I do not think we need to establish bona fides - Jundo and Taigu witness suffering in many venues, as priests and in their personal lives. Chet, in his work, sees plenty of suffering and pain. No need for one-upmanship. Street cred has been established by all parties.
What is the intention behind the use of harsh words and "I'm taking my ball and going home" forms of speech to characterize one's own or the other's view? I hear what Chet is saying - he feels that that there is an institutional antipathy, or "immune reaction," so to speak, to his posts...
What kind of response does one hope to evoke, or use to signal recognition of Chet's position (whether one agrees or disagrees) by using dismissive forms of speech? What type of outcome is envisioned? Listening and enquiry stop and accusations and finger pointing begin to take place.... (Jen and Willow, Thank you for your powerful posts)
With regard to delusions influencing one's view, and practice, there is no question... no one is immune from the cycles of samsara. I like Kodo Sawaki's description here - "I am deluded with all the gold trimmings!" That certainly goes for me - and practice begins, as I understand it, with that recognition as a starting point..... To me, the important point is how one deals with delusion in the course of how we perceive and relate to life..... teachers, practitioners are humans... we do not look to one another to be perfect but to practice the way.... and we learn from the example, not from words..... we all look to and learn from one another, and learn together. We are people of "no rank"....
The written medium furthermore, can lend itself to misperception - the well-intentioned use of humour to defuse an emotionally charged situation can sometimes be interpreted differently.....
I implore you all to please reflect deeply on this.... we are a sangha - there will be disagreements and strong emotions - how we express them and handle them is the key to our practice in action.....
A deep bow to everyone,
Yugen
Hey everyone,
I genuinely care for the people in this dialogue, and I am aware of the history. With regard to the present thread -
There are several conversations going on here -
1) Chugai's posting links to stong and graphic material -
2) Chet, Jundo, and Taigu going back and forth regarding Zen and individual identity, balanced view, displays of violence used to illustrate a point, etc.
3) People trying to discusss the underlying substantive issues to defuse the emotional discourse/content, and the example of the "tough love" teaching method...
I do not want to engage on the substance of the issues - (an unaccustomed position for me to take) - but rather - ask all involved to check themselves by asking a few questions:
1) Is my speech skillful?
2) Is my speech compassionate?
3)Is my speech honest?
4)How will my speech be received by the person I am addressing? What is the point I want them to hear?
There are important issues in this thread that deserve to be discussed to everyone's benefit -
This goes for all of us - in this case we are all teachers and all students - we are all here because we realize that suffering and pain exist in the world. I do not think we need to establish bona fides - Jundo and Taigu witness suffering in many venues, as priests and in their personal lives. Chet, in his work, sees plenty of suffering and pain. No need for one-upmanship. Street cred has been established by all parties.
What is the intention behind the use of harsh words and "I'm taking my ball and going home" forms of speech to characterize one's own or the other's view? I hear what Chet is saying - he feels that that there is an institutional antipathy, or "immune reaction," so to speak, to his posts...
What kind of response does one hope to evoke, or use to signal recognition of Chet's position (whether one agrees or disagrees) by using dismissive forms of speech? What type of outcome is envisioned? Listening and enquiry stop and accusations and finger pointing begin to take place.... (Jen and Willow, Thank you for your powerful posts)
With regard to delusions influencing one's view, and practice, there is no question... no one is immune from the cycles of samsara. I like Kodo Sawaki's description here - "I am deluded with all the gold trimmings!" That certainly goes for me - and practice begins, as I understand it, with that recognition as a starting point..... To me, the important point is how one deals with delusion in the course of how we perceive and relate to life..... teachers, practitioners are humans... we do not look to one another to be perfect but to practice the way.... and we learn from the example, not from words..... we all look to and learn from one another, and learn together. We are people of "no rank"....
The written medium furthermore, can lend itself to misperception - the well-intentioned use of humour to defuse an emotionally charged situation can sometimes be interpreted differently.....
I implore you all to please reflect deeply on this.... we are a sangha - there will be disagreements and strong emotions - how we express them and handle them is the key to our practice in action.....
A deep bow to everyone,
Yugen
Comment