Re: Newcomer Attrition in Zen (SPLIT TOPIC)
Just some more random thoughts on this topic.
Hi All,
Though I don't know about the studies which have been done to arrive at this percentile, I'll still go with it. Though 95% seems like shocking number leading to concern, I believe it to be a rather common number. I say this from experience playing both the role of the common 95% and the rare 5% in regards to my own various endeavors.
The longer you stick with any given commitment the more you bear witness to the commings and goings of that larger percentile who quit or move on to something else.
I'm sure others can attest to this and how numbers like these don't just apply to Zen.
Take for example the martial arts. Having given many years of study to them I have seen countless people come and go. Some after a month, others after a year, and even some yet after just one class.
As to the argument that if we just change/remove things we can retain more people I further have this to say. Getting punched in the face hurts! Aversion to pain quite likely makes up a portion of the 95% in this regard. So how many more people could we keep in class if we just eliminated punching and kicking? Would it be the same art if we did?
That's not to say that you can't remove some things here too. It just must be done by skillful means. An example of this can be found in Judo. The founder(Jigoro Kano) eliminated many of the dangerous techniques of Jujitsu when creating his own system.
Once again careful consideration must go into what will come out on the other end if you do!
Gassho,
John
Just some more random thoughts on this topic.
Michael wrote:
Statistics on another forum shows an extremely high attrition rate (95% +)
Statistics on another forum shows an extremely high attrition rate (95% +)
Though I don't know about the studies which have been done to arrive at this percentile, I'll still go with it. Though 95% seems like shocking number leading to concern, I believe it to be a rather common number. I say this from experience playing both the role of the common 95% and the rare 5% in regards to my own various endeavors.
The longer you stick with any given commitment the more you bear witness to the commings and goings of that larger percentile who quit or move on to something else.
I'm sure others can attest to this and how numbers like these don't just apply to Zen.
Take for example the martial arts. Having given many years of study to them I have seen countless people come and go. Some after a month, others after a year, and even some yet after just one class.
As to the argument that if we just change/remove things we can retain more people I further have this to say. Getting punched in the face hurts! Aversion to pain quite likely makes up a portion of the 95% in this regard. So how many more people could we keep in class if we just eliminated punching and kicking? Would it be the same art if we did?
That's not to say that you can't remove some things here too. It just must be done by skillful means. An example of this can be found in Judo. The founder(Jigoro Kano) eliminated many of the dangerous techniques of Jujitsu when creating his own system.
Once again careful consideration must go into what will come out on the other end if you do!
Gassho,
John
Comment