Hi Jundo,
That made me think of a couple of papers I read a few years ago from Nick Bostrom (Director, Future of Humanity Institute, Faculty of Philosophy, Oxford University) and Jürgen Schmidhuber (Co-Director of the Swiss Institute for Artificial Intelligence). In popular terms, what they're arguing for is a kind of 'Matrix' theory. The difference is, however, they're not science-fiction writers, but rather quite brilliant scientists.
At the time I read those papers a few years ago, I found those theories quite disturbing. Now, I just think, so what? Even if they're true, I'll just continue with my practice as best I can.
Gassho
Kenneth
Originally posted by Jundo
"This paper ('Are you living in a computer simulation' argues that at least one of the following propositions is true: (1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching the posthuman stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run significant number of simulations or (variations) of their evolutionary history; (3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation. It follows that the naïve transhumanist dogma that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor-simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation. " -- Nick Bostrom (http://www.nickbostrom.com/)
"As a consequence of Moore's law, each decade computers are getting roughly 1000 times faster by cost. Apply Moore's law to the video game business. As the virtual worlds get more convincing many people will spend more time in them. Soon most universes will be virtual, only one (the original) will be real. Then many will be led to suspect the real one is a simulation as well. Some are already suspecting this today." -- Jürgen Schmidhuber (http://www.idsia.ch/~juergen/computeruniverse.html)
Gassho
Kenneth
Comment