If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
in 1960 Karlfried Graf Duerckheim wrote a book: "Der Altag als Uebung" I don't know if it was translated in English, would be something like 'daily life as practice'. some questions have answers.
in 1960 Karlfried Graf Duerckheim wrote a book: "Der Altag als Uebung" I don't know if it was translated in English, would be something like 'daily life as practice'. some questions have answers.
Sometimes the koans aren't in books but in our lives; sometimes we read something that isn't necessarily a "Zen" book but presents what is very much a koan.
Who is the qualified teacher who can teach us the koan that is our lives?
Gassho,
Rish
-st/lah
ps. ok I'm being koany. lol
I agree with this. They are like poems or songs on the radio, and can have different meanings or aspects that come alive for us at different times, not even necessarily what the poet or song writer himself "meant." In fact, most of the Koans are now known not to be historical events, but literary tropes written centuries after the people supposedly in them were gone, and most of the Koans (like the famous "Does a Dog Have Buddha Nature" MU Koan) have evolved through time. Wonderful book on the history of that Koan alone ...
Like Cats and Dogs: Contesting the Mu Koan in Zen Buddhism
In a careful analysis of the historical and rhetorical basis of the literature, Steven Heine demonstrates that the Mu version of the case, preferred by advocates of the key-phrase approach, does not by any means constitute the final word concerning the meaning and significance of the Mu Koan. He shows that another canonical version, which gives both "Yes" and "No" responses, must be taken into account. Like Cats and Dogs offers critical insight and a new theoretical perspective on "the koan of koans."
...
[Heine] is able to raise a number of valuable questions about the history of this text, but there are two primary questions. First, why is this particular response to the question about a dog’s Buddha-nature so predominant (what Heine calls the “Ur Version”), when there are a number of alternative responses to this question in the textual history of Chan Buddhism? In other examples there are affirmative answers to the question, or both affirmative and negative answers, or additional questions and statements concerning the initial question. [End Page 671]
Second, why has Dahui’s insistence on the authority of Zhaozhou’s Mu come to displace the rich literary heritage of other renowned patriarchs devoted to alternative versions? Dahui’s most notable contribution to kōan practice is his use of the key-phrase or “head-word” method, epitomized in Zhaozhou’s Mu, where the student is told to forget all concerns about the particulars of question-and-answer in the case, and instead simply focus on Mu alone. In this approach, what Heine calls “Emphatic Mu,” the primary power of Zhaozhou’s Mu is in its capacity to block any linguistic entry to realization, so that the student must demonstrate their insight in a direct, nonverbal fashion. Heine contrasts the Emphatic Mu approach to an “Expansive Mu” method where “words perpetuate words” (p. 29). The latter is exemplified in “Dual Version” cases where one finds both affirmative and negative answers to the initial question, thus encouraging original literary responses to reveal and expand the practitioner’s insights. Heine traces the Expansive Mu approach to Hongzhi in the twelfth-century Southern Song, and finds this approach most prominently displayed in the works of the thirteenth-century Japanese Zen master, Eihei Dōgen.
While Heine’s critical historical study uncovers important omissions and inconsistencies in contemporary scholarship on the Mu kōan, its most significant contribution...
Anyone who says that one Koan has one approach is trying to force life into a mold. In my belief, the Koans are often misused in that way, and should be seen as living things.
Anyone who says that one Koan has one approach is trying to force life into a mold. In my belief, the Koans are often misused in that way, and should be seen as living things.
you are absolutely right. There is not one answer to a koan. In fact every student has a different answer. In fact, sometimes you get the same koan back later and than you will have an other approach and another answer. That's why you cannot give an answer by the book, like Yoel Hoffmann, the sound of the one hand; 281 koans and there answers.
coos
std
hobo kore dojo / 歩歩是道場 / step, step, there is my place of practice
Aprāpti (अप्राप्ति) non-attainment
Bit of a trip down memory lane this week - it's pretty saluatory going back through my old posts (blush!) -but this discussion on the koan
Mu might be worth mentioning - regarding the input of others not my own faltering steps.
I have been trying to grasp the meaning of Mu for a couple of weeks now.
Asking whether a dog has Buddha nature hasn't really helped! :?
I'm reading Robert Aitken's 'The Mind of Clover' and he does rather assume that when he writes
'Let Mu breathe Mu' the reader will know what that means. He makes a lot of reference to
Bit of a trip down memory lane this week - it's pretty saluatory going back through my old posts (blush!) -but this discussion on the koan
Mu might be worth mentioning - regarding the input of others not my own faltering steps.
I have been trying to grasp the meaning of Mu for a couple of weeks now.
Asking whether a dog has Buddha nature hasn't really helped! :?
I'm reading Robert Aitken's 'The Mind of Clover' and he does rather assume that when he writes
'Let Mu breathe Mu' the reader will know what that means. He makes a lot of reference to
Willow
ST
Hi Willow,
Regarding ‘Essential Writings on Zen's most important Koan'. book about Mu that you mention on the other thread - I read this book many times. It’s always nice to carry Mu in your pocket and pull it out when you need to.
Hi Willow,
Regarding ‘Essential Writings on Zen's most important Koan'. book about Mu that you mention on the other thread - I read this book many times. It’s always nice to carry Mu in your pocket and pull it out when you need to.
Gasho, Jishin, _/st\_
Hi Jishin,
I never did read very far into the book - I must have another look. Good to hear you enjoyed it.
Bit of a trip down memory lane this week - it's pretty saluatory going back through my old posts (blush!) -but this discussion on the koan
Mu might be worth mentioning - regarding the input of others not my own faltering steps.
I have been trying to grasp the meaning of Mu for a couple of weeks now.
Asking whether a dog has Buddha nature hasn't really helped! :?
I'm reading Robert Aitken's 'The Mind of Clover' and he does rather assume that when he writes
'Let Mu breathe Mu' the reader will know what that means. He makes a lot of reference to
Willow
ST
Just read through the old thread, and the Nishijima explanation of mu was fantastic. It struck me as akin to when one of my children starts to ask a question that I know is trouble, and I give them a "no"...not that the answer to the question is no, but the whole question is a big NO!
Comment