To Jakuden and Jika,
I like both of your posts because you're talking about "acceptance" and what that really means. I hope it's alright if I add to this a little. You both seem to be talking about the situation like this: when a person is being annoying, I need to be accepting of that person and not judge, and then this will lead you to a more contented, peaceful place. But to me that has "acceptance" only going one way. To me, we're not going through the world and looking at it and going "I accept that, I accept this, I accept that too." We are looking at ourselves. Can I accept my frustration? Can I accept that I'm feeling annoyed? How do I let that energy move in my body and mind? Acceptance is not out there; it is right here, this body and mind. My acceptance or non-acceptance of those annoying ladies is only my acceptance or non-acceptance of myself, my mind, in that moment. I ask myself: who is annoying you?
To Beakon, I'd say that you shouldn't worry about trying to figure out how to deal with rejection. That seems to me to be the wrong starting place. You should be thinking about what you're wanting. When we're rejected, we begin by wanting something, and when we don't get the object we want (whether it is a romantic partner or a better job or nicer co-workers), then we feel like we're a failure. But what happens to the world when we want less? What happens to the world when we go into a situation and are not expecting something from it? Where does rejection go then? I know this is difficult - we're conditioned to think and overthink and analyze and over-analyze (I'm wonderfully horrible at it, and most of my writing deals with it) and to want, but perhaps if you approach the thing differently, you might feel a little lighter.
Gassho,
Alan
sattoday
I like both of your posts because you're talking about "acceptance" and what that really means. I hope it's alright if I add to this a little. You both seem to be talking about the situation like this: when a person is being annoying, I need to be accepting of that person and not judge, and then this will lead you to a more contented, peaceful place. But to me that has "acceptance" only going one way. To me, we're not going through the world and looking at it and going "I accept that, I accept this, I accept that too." We are looking at ourselves. Can I accept my frustration? Can I accept that I'm feeling annoyed? How do I let that energy move in my body and mind? Acceptance is not out there; it is right here, this body and mind. My acceptance or non-acceptance of those annoying ladies is only my acceptance or non-acceptance of myself, my mind, in that moment. I ask myself: who is annoying you?
To Beakon, I'd say that you shouldn't worry about trying to figure out how to deal with rejection. That seems to me to be the wrong starting place. You should be thinking about what you're wanting. When we're rejected, we begin by wanting something, and when we don't get the object we want (whether it is a romantic partner or a better job or nicer co-workers), then we feel like we're a failure. But what happens to the world when we want less? What happens to the world when we go into a situation and are not expecting something from it? Where does rejection go then? I know this is difficult - we're conditioned to think and overthink and analyze and over-analyze (I'm wonderfully horrible at it, and most of my writing deals with it) and to want, but perhaps if you approach the thing differently, you might feel a little lighter.
Gassho,
Alan
sattoday
Comment