I don't know if this makes sense to anyone but somehow this topic feels like I'm being presented with a koan. The more I reflect on the different views expressed, the less certain I feel about the central idea that we can experience someone else's pain. In other words, I'm wrestling with the idea that pain is personal to an individual and can be "marked out" in this way.
Carl Rogers A Way Of Being (p 140) "The state of empathy, or being empathic, is to perceive the internal frame of reference of another with accuracy and with the emotional components and meanings which pertain thereto as if one were the person, but without ever losing the "as if" condition
This quote reinforces the point made by several people in this thread, that we must skillfully use empathy without forgetting the "as if" component (without making it about us or merging with the other person's distress). Yet, for me, this clashes somehow with the realisation that self and other are not separate.
If my friend cries and I feel some of her sadness, whose sadness is this?
Gassho,
Enjaku
Sat
Carl Rogers A Way Of Being (p 140) "The state of empathy, or being empathic, is to perceive the internal frame of reference of another with accuracy and with the emotional components and meanings which pertain thereto as if one were the person, but without ever losing the "as if" condition
This quote reinforces the point made by several people in this thread, that we must skillfully use empathy without forgetting the "as if" component (without making it about us or merging with the other person's distress). Yet, for me, this clashes somehow with the realisation that self and other are not separate.
If my friend cries and I feel some of her sadness, whose sadness is this?
Gassho,
Enjaku
Sat
Comment