About if you really understands something
Or all your "understanding" is just you acting as a parrot, quoting ideas and talks and writings from others?
I read somewhere a story about a monk who tore up all his books...I think of it sometimes! (but I like my books soooo much...)
You know. One thing is to know directly; the other is more common, what we are doing always: we always relate to the first way someone told us something for judging reality from then on...
Even to understand Dharma, even to be a little able to see dharma in our day-by-day reality we have to have some ideas, as if someone has to "point" reality for us to see...maybe thats why its called "BuddhaDharma" (we had to have a Buddha to point us the obvious)...BuddhaDharma is BuddhaDharma. And what is "MarcosDharma"? and (say your name is Joe) how about "JoeDharma"? Well, aren't we all Buddhas?!
Maybe something like: "Joe reunited his fellows and said: O brothers and sisters: Careful when you walk barefoot 'cause you can harm your "pinky" on a desk!" Nothing important or great. But good advice!
These "kensho" you have, is it really?! or is it the "kensho" someone told you it would be?
Is this love you think you feel really Love or what someone told you "love" is?
Why should we format reality as a "philosophy", a "religion" or a "way of life"?
Do we "believe" in what we tell people (and in what we tell ourselves)
Or had we experienced it without possibility of contestation?
And...if so, do contestation matters? Are we tranquil with what we (think we) are?
Or are we just trying to fill some of our many holes with "zenny" b******?
But isn't it better just to know by ourselves, without creating any filters based on other ideas to "classify" and see?
Where are our Original knowledge? this one which is treasure from the "Treasure room" where we can "serve ourselves at will" master Dogen mentioned? (here I am quoting... :/ )
I don't really want to look for nothing.
We don't really need to know nothing. And maybe better this way. I guess. Knowing nothing we can see so much more of Nothing.
Sorry to disrupt silence.
Or all your "understanding" is just you acting as a parrot, quoting ideas and talks and writings from others?
I read somewhere a story about a monk who tore up all his books...I think of it sometimes! (but I like my books soooo much...)
You know. One thing is to know directly; the other is more common, what we are doing always: we always relate to the first way someone told us something for judging reality from then on...
Even to understand Dharma, even to be a little able to see dharma in our day-by-day reality we have to have some ideas, as if someone has to "point" reality for us to see...maybe thats why its called "BuddhaDharma" (we had to have a Buddha to point us the obvious)...BuddhaDharma is BuddhaDharma. And what is "MarcosDharma"? and (say your name is Joe) how about "JoeDharma"? Well, aren't we all Buddhas?!
Maybe something like: "Joe reunited his fellows and said: O brothers and sisters: Careful when you walk barefoot 'cause you can harm your "pinky" on a desk!" Nothing important or great. But good advice!
These "kensho" you have, is it really?! or is it the "kensho" someone told you it would be?
Is this love you think you feel really Love or what someone told you "love" is?
Why should we format reality as a "philosophy", a "religion" or a "way of life"?
Do we "believe" in what we tell people (and in what we tell ourselves)
Or had we experienced it without possibility of contestation?
And...if so, do contestation matters? Are we tranquil with what we (think we) are?
Or are we just trying to fill some of our many holes with "zenny" b******?
But isn't it better just to know by ourselves, without creating any filters based on other ideas to "classify" and see?
Where are our Original knowledge? this one which is treasure from the "Treasure room" where we can "serve ourselves at will" master Dogen mentioned? (here I am quoting... :/ )
I don't really want to look for nothing.
We don't really need to know nothing. And maybe better this way. I guess. Knowing nothing we can see so much more of Nothing.
Sorry to disrupt silence.
Comment