Maybe this has come up before (I could not find anything by searching), but I was hoping that anyone could help me with this.
I have heard that people who are not born into the tradition most often pursue religious philosophies like Zen Buddhism because they have a burning question to which they need an answer. What about those for whom no question exists? Is the uncertainty of a question a question in and of itself, therefore no question = question, not two (and therefore, just sit). Alternatively, is no question indicative of a lack of introspection (and therefore, just sit)?
Sorry, for a man with no questions, I have a lot of questions.
Gassho,
Morgan
I have heard that people who are not born into the tradition most often pursue religious philosophies like Zen Buddhism because they have a burning question to which they need an answer. What about those for whom no question exists? Is the uncertainty of a question a question in and of itself, therefore no question = question, not two (and therefore, just sit). Alternatively, is no question indicative of a lack of introspection (and therefore, just sit)?
Sorry, for a man with no questions, I have a lot of questions.
Gassho,
Morgan


Shikantaza sure has aspects as you describe, yet it is so much more than even such (for example, one should experience all space and time realized and brought to fruition in each moment of sitting too. Why? Because thus we come to experience each moment of life as all space and time realized and brought to fruition).
Comment