If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Has anyone read this book before? I'm trying to read it now and finding it difficult to plow through. I'm currently reading "The Bloodstream Sermon" trying to make heads or tails out of it.
Yes, and it is wonderful. We have had a couple of threads on Bodhidharma before that I will quote and link to. There are a few things to keep in mind in reading the book.
First, most of the story of "Bodhidharma" is a legend built up over the centuries, a paradigm that is meant to inspire and instruct on the path. His life is much like that of "Moses" leading the children over the Red Sea ... a story of liberation that may not have happened as historical event, but inspires us to liberation too today. Little is known about him, most of the stories of Bodhidharma ... such as his meeting with "Emperor Wu" ... were not added to his biography until centuries later, probably by story tellers wishes to embellish and teach a lesson. Here is more on the topic, by a scholar, if you wish ...
Faure uses structural criticism to analyse Bodhidharma's life as a literary piece belonging to the genre of hagiography, rejecting obsolete concepts of historical individuality and all methodological extremes to reach a new, limited understanding of Bodhidharma's coming from the West
Only one of the writings in that book might arguably actually be by Bodhidharma, the "Two Entrances and Four Practices". Red Pine, in another good book "Zen Baggage", comments on his earlier Bodhidharma translations, "How much of it was actually by Bodhidharma is unknown, but even scholars agree that the one called [Two Entrances and] Four Practices was most likely his." In his "The Bodhidharma Anthology", Jeffrey Broughton writes, "For decades discussion [by scholars] both Japanese and Western, has concentrated on the Two Entrances [and Four Practices], and has come to the consensus that only this text can be attributed to Bodhidharma." Historian John McRae agrees ...
In the early part of this century, the discovery of a walled-up cave in northwest China led to the retrieval of a lost early Ch'an (Zen) literature of the T'ang dynasty (618-907). One of the recovered Zen texts was a seven-piece collection, the Bodhidharma Anthology. Of the numerous texts attributed to Bodhidharma, this anthology is the only one generally believed to contain authentic Bodhidharma material.Jeffrey L. Broughton provides a reliable annotated translation of the Bodhidharma Anthology along with a detailed study of its nature, content, and background. His work is especially important for its rendering of the three Records, which contain some of the earliest Zen dialogues and constitute the real beginnings of Zen literature.The vivid dialogues and sayings of Master Yuan, a long-forgotten member of the Bodhidharma circle, are the hallmark of the Records. Master Yuan consistently criticizes reliance on the Dharma, on teachers, on meditative practice, and on scripture, all of which lead to self-deception and confusion, he says. According to Master Yuan, if one has spirit and does not seek anything, including the teachings of Buddhism, then one will attain the quietude of liberation. The boldness in Yuan's utterances prefigures much of the full-blown Zen tradition we recognize today.Broughton utilizes a Tibetan translation of the Bodhidharma Anthology as an informative gloss on the Chinese original. Placing the anthology within the context of the Tun-huang Zen manuscripts as a whole, he proposes a new approach to the study of Zen, one that concentrates on literary history, a genealogy of texts rather than the usual genealogy of masters.In the early part of this century, the discovery of a walled-up cave in northwest China led to the retrieval of a lost early Ch'an (Zen) literature of the T'ang dynasty (618-907). One of the recovered Zen texts was a seven-piece collection, the Bodhidh
Even then, the case is far from strong, and based on much supposition. Further, it is hard to say that "Zen" even yet existed, or that that writing is even particularly a "Zen (Chan in Chinese) text", perhaps being at most what is known as proto-Chan. I once wrote an essay over at ZFI in which I found some Shikantaza flavor in it, but was really reaching a bit (http://www.zenforuminternational.org...05538#p1055388). The other texts in the book, such as the "Bloodstream Sermon" were written centuries after the time of Bodhidharma, by some authors from later Zen schools. They can be a bit hard to understand because one needs to know both Zen and Mahayana "lingo" and philosophical ideas to know what is being expressed in them. However, Red Pines footnotes and introduction in the book are very helpful in that regard.
Here is more on Bodhidharma the Legend, including the Bodhidharma Action Figure ...
Its my favorite next to "Realizing Genjokoan", read it 2 years ago or so, I think I approached it rather like poetry, some parts made much sense to me. Large parts not made sense to me, but thats ok, I think, as long as a few seeds make it. Nothing to advice, just enjoy Jigetsu,
_()_
Myoku
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
I'm currently reading "The Bloodstream Sermon" trying to make heads or tails out of it.
Comment