If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Don't worry, I'm not trying to get this Sangha do give me an answer( I already handed in the paper) I just thought the question itself was a good one and wanted to hear your thoughts on it
If samsara and nirvana are ultimately the same, why should one want to achieve enlightenment? In fact, how is this even possible?
Few questions to your question. How are samsara and nirvana the same? And in what way does enlightenment correspond to them? I ask for two reasons. To clarify your premise and understand your definitions.
G
S
Sent from my I897 using Tapatalk
We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are.
~Anaïs Nin
Few questions to your question. How are samsara and nirvana the same? And in what way does enlightenment correspond to them? I ask for two reasons. To clarify your premise and understand your definitions.
In looking at the arrival of Mahayana Buddhism as opposed to the school Theravadan where Samsara was something to be escaped from, the early Mahayana teachers taught that Nirvana is found through Samsara, not by escaping it. Like how the Lotus can only grow in muddy waters, we too become awakening by taking nourishment from the world around us, ie;Samsara itself.
But I think my Professor is asking from the early Theravadan perspective, of if this is ultimately it, and Nirvana and Samsara are identical, the what's the point of practice?
What class was this for?!
My Eastern Philosophy class. My professor decided to just focus it on Buddhism for this Semester.
I think one does not want to achieve enlightenment per se.
I understand what you say about samsara and nirvana being the same, but at the same time we just sit. Opening our minds, thinking clear with no attachments come only with time and practice.
Not sure if this is enlightenment but I think we can't pursue it as a goal. Just my two cents.
I'd say that to in order to realize the fact that samsara is nirvana you need the practice. You may have a belief that samsara is nirvana, you can even prove it using some logic and philosophy, but until it's in your "kishkas" (guts) as Jundo said recently, those are just philosophical or religious notions to play with.
Aren't samsara, nirvana and enlightenment concepts?
Hence we practice non-conceptualisation to achieve non-conceptualisation and realise non-conceptual practice.
Just something that came to mind!?!
Heisoku 平 息
Every day is a journey, and the journey itself is home. (Basho)
What is the relationship between compassion toward others and realizing the true nature of the self?
The true nature of the self is that there is no difference between "You" and "I". There is in fact, no self that separates "me" from "others", so when I realize the true nature of the "self" I realize compassion for all beings, because "I" and "all beings" are the same.
Compassion is being able to put yourself in another's shoes and genuinely "feel for them", how much easier is it to put yourself in another's shoes when they are already on your own feet?
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment