Hello !
I 'm reading Nagarjuna again, as i do from time to time, and the commentator said in the preface that Nagarjuna fought against a "metaphysical" view of buddhism and was rather defending a "therapeutical" approach - which, according to what i read, is how buddhism is supposed to be understood.
Okay, so my question follows : how is emptiness (which i understand as the absence of things existing by themselves) therapeutic ? How does it help with suffering ? Nagarjuna often writes about emptiness meaning that all is calm, appeased. Why ?
I mean, even if i know that my suffering is empty, i still suffer !
Uggy (tried to make it short),
Sat today
LAH
I 'm reading Nagarjuna again, as i do from time to time, and the commentator said in the preface that Nagarjuna fought against a "metaphysical" view of buddhism and was rather defending a "therapeutical" approach - which, according to what i read, is how buddhism is supposed to be understood.
Okay, so my question follows : how is emptiness (which i understand as the absence of things existing by themselves) therapeutic ? How does it help with suffering ? Nagarjuna often writes about emptiness meaning that all is calm, appeased. Why ?
I mean, even if i know that my suffering is empty, i still suffer !
Uggy (tried to make it short),
Sat today
LAH
Comment