A TREELEAF EXPERIMENT: Three Sacred Sentences (Please Join Poll)

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jundo
    replied
    Hi,

    Because of the mix of comments here, I am going to post a poll now just to see how our members feel now that we have experimented with "Three Sacred Sentences" for awhile. It will give a sense whether folks believe that they benefit from such a practice or not, and how strongly they feel. I am hearing strong voices on both sides, and many in between too. It is important and helpful to know, and I thank you for taking a moment to respond.

    Members' Poll (Your Participation Requested): "Three Sacred Sentences"


    The poll is anonymous, and also will be in the "All of Life" section which is open and visible to Treeleaf members only. It will be up for about a week.

    I am going to close this thread now, so please post any comments or advice in the new thread. Thank you.

    Gassho, Jundo

    STLah

    Leave a comment:


  • Nengei
    replied
    Terseness, brevity, succinctness, conciseness... these contribute a great deal to clarity, and ensure that as a writer I am not using the shotgun approach to seem like I know something. I appreciate that I can strive for briefness without being worried if I must write more.

    "In my family, anyone who uses one word when ten will do simply isn't trying hard enough." - or something like that. President Bartlet, The West Wing.

    Gassho,
    然芸 Nengei
    Sat today. LAH.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kyonin
    replied
    Hi all,

    These days I find myself juggling a lot of stuff at the same time. The few sentences work really well for me because it forces me to go right to the point and to respect other's right for quiet and silence.

    I think nothing stops us from mainly using the 3 Sentences format most of the time

    Gassho,

    Kyonin
    Sat/LAH

    Leave a comment:


  • Kyōsen
    replied
    Regardless of official or unofficial guidelines, I intend to make a conscious effort to maintain this notion of Three Sacred Sentences if only for my own sake. I like the idea as sometimes I can be a little verbose and can use some structure to reign that in.

    Gassho
    Kyōsen
    Sat|LAH

    Leave a comment:


  • Gareth
    replied
    I think all this, even the extent to which our views are collected or valued, is up to the people running the Sangha, as the rule in question seems zen-related. It's nice to know that shorter posts and responses are just as valued, though.

    Gassho,
    Gareth
    Sat today
    Last edited by Gareth; 08-21-2020, 07:42 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • A.J.
    replied
    I'm new at this but have enjoyed the three sentence rule myself. At time's I've had to stretch a sentence or two and at other times have left nuance out that would require more elaboration, yet the need for brevity has been a thoughtful exercise. All in all, if you ask me, I am in favor of keeping it around as a soft rule (guideline) that is nevertheless taken seriously even though it isn't an absolute requirement.

    Gassho,

    Andrew,

    Satlah

    Leave a comment:


  • Amelia
    replied
    I will still be trying to uphold the shorter posts for myself, unless the need for longer arises. Anybody who enjoys the challenge of brevity can do so.

    Gassho
    Sat today, lah

    Leave a comment:


  • Jundo
    replied
    Originally posted by Jishin
    ... I have not read a medical article word for word since medical school and the abstract does a great job of summarizing the contents...
    Well, as long as you get the important bits! I always worry that my doctor was asleep in class the day they discussed my syndrome in medical school.

    Gassho, J

    STLah

    Leave a comment:


  • Jishin
    replied
    I personally don't read a post word for word if it is too long. I may read the beginning and last part slow but speed through the rest (speed reading). It's a technique learned for technical reading and I use it for everything I read (I have not read a medical article word for word since medical school and the abstract does a great job of summarizing the contents).

    So, posts should not be limited in length at all. If the reader is inclined to read word for word of a post then it's up to the reader to do so. I am sure Jundo speeds reads too if you think about it due to the repetitive nature of questions that come up and his repetitive answers and lack of time on his part.

    Gassho, ST

    Leave a comment:


  • Jundo
    replied
    Originally posted by Onka
    Polls are hardly democratic and only serve to isolate and silence.
    How is that, Onka?

    Gassho, J

    STLah

    Leave a comment:


  • Doshin
    replied
    Originally posted by Tairin
    I liked the 3 sentence guideline and I will endeavour to continue to follow it where possible.


    Tairin
    Sat today and lah

    Same here because I think it good practice for me.

    Doshin
    St

    Leave a comment:


  • Tairin
    replied
    I liked the 3 sentence guideline and I will endeavour to continue to follow it where possible.


    Tairin
    Sat today and lah

    Leave a comment:


  • Bion
    replied
    Originally posted by Jundo
    UPDATE: PLAN DROPPED

    Dear All,

    Last minute, I have been persuaded by several voices that I trust that the "Three Sentences" policy should be dropped. So, we will not be moving forward with this because of the feelings expressed. Perhaps it can be revived from time to time as a practice, but not as a standing request. The feeling seems to be that it would just be too restrictive on the ability of people to communicate.

    I have to say that I still disagree, but I also believe in going along with consensus and popular feeling in the Sangha about how we structure things. In my view, a Zen group is a place where we earnestly try to drop words, ideas and complex analysis, and the "three sacred sentences" were helping us do so. It did not completely prevent us from saying more when needed, because we could just put a "sorry, needed to say more this time" at the end (just as I am going to do with this post). Even if it sometimes caused long sentences with too many colons ";" (and parenthesis) it nonetheless caused us to reflect on what is truly necessary to say, and not take our thoughts lightly (and was not to apply in our "no words" book club, art circle, Precept discussion for Jukai and the like where some depth of thought and words is more welcome). On the other hand, others felt that it is too forceful, and a simple reminder from time to time would be better.

    I felt it was really an effective practice for us, but I also believe in democracy. So, unless there is suddenly a flood of voices the other way who feel that the experiment should be kept, the plan is shelved, perhaps to be revived as a short-term practice from time to time.

    Gassho, Jundo

    SatTodayLAH

    (sorry, needed more than three sentences this time)
    I too thought about whether it was a beneficial thing or not when I saw your post. It does serve as a really fantastic exercise of restraint and of efficiency of vocabulary and clarity, although I’m not sure how many actually ponder just how few words are needed to get one’s point across and how many are trying to figure out ways to make sentences longer to fit in everything they want to say. The issue I can find is that since the sangha is online, and we all live in different parts of the world and are all active at different times, many might feel a need for more socializing and more fellowship aside from the scheduled practice and that translates to more conversations happening which can be challenging when limited to three sentences, even when that rule is slightly flexible.

    SatToday lah

    Leave a comment:


  • Kokuu
    replied
    I agree that it is a difficult policy to enforce across all areas of the forum, and therefore we end up with too many exceptions to the rule. That said, I do think it is a very worthwhile practice to employ from time to time. Perhaps we can choose to enforce it for only a week at time at certain times of year (around certain holidays or other events?).
    I think that is what a lot of us felt behind the scenes, Rob, as well as the difficulty of answering questions from members in such a short space.

    But, we are exploring ideas of how we can still emphasise brevity in terms of using as few words as possible to say what you need (and Evan's pop-up box type plan is one of those that came up!), while not enforcing a set number of sentences, words or characters.

    Ango is definitely a good time for this to be a individual commitment, as we rest in greater silence, and if it becomes the approach of many that sets the tone for the whole sangha.

    Gassho
    Kokuu
    -sattoday/lah-

    Leave a comment:


  • gaurdianaq
    replied
    So just a thought, but what if we added a plugin of sort that detects if you have a rather long post, and asks you to confirm before you hit submit. An extra nudge to think about if you really needed to say all that was said. I can't imagine it would be hard to find a plugin for vbulletin that checks the length of a post and spawns a little pop up dialog, and if such a thing doesn't exist I can't imagine it would be hard to write, if people liked the idea I could try and do a bit of research into vBulletin plugins.


    Evan,
    Sat today!

    Leave a comment:

Working...