Hey folks!
When reading the texts of the old Chinese masters, I find them stylistically very different from Master Dogen's writings. It seems to me that while Dogen's essays and writings are "canonical" in content (not 100%, of course he's explaining the Dharma in his own beautiful way), the style tends to be much more philosophically dense.
So that made me wonder... how much of Dogen's style is influenced by his Tendai background? I know for sure that he held the Lotus sutra in high regard
I didn't find any specific post about this but I could be mistaken, so feel free to redirect me to older posts. Forgive me for my broken english
Gassho,
Alex
sat/LaH
When reading the texts of the old Chinese masters, I find them stylistically very different from Master Dogen's writings. It seems to me that while Dogen's essays and writings are "canonical" in content (not 100%, of course he's explaining the Dharma in his own beautiful way), the style tends to be much more philosophically dense.
So that made me wonder... how much of Dogen's style is influenced by his Tendai background? I know for sure that he held the Lotus sutra in high regard
I didn't find any specific post about this but I could be mistaken, so feel free to redirect me to older posts. Forgive me for my broken english

Gassho,
Alex
sat/LaH
Comment