I am going to split this chapter into three parts, based on how it is divided in the book, with this first part encompassing pages 101-106 (from the beginning of the chapter to the section titled ‘Our Collective Predicament’).
Here, David Loy points out that Buddhism has almost always been seen to apply to the awakening of individuals, rather than to see the greed, anger and ignorance present in social systems that causes suffering. He suggests that we need to focus more on this ‘social dukkha’.
He points out that just because the Buddha did not talk about climate change and other environmental issues, and was unaware of most of the basic understanding of science that we take for granted now, does not mean that these things cannot be part of a evolving Buddhist tradition.
Loy looks at the predicament of the individual in terms of Buddhist thought, and terms our seeking after external things into two groups:
1. Lack projects, which fill our sense of lack
2. Reality projects, which make us feel more real, and feed our ego
Questions for this week, and feel free also to respond to anything else in this section which speaks to you:
Do you think that Loy accurately summarises the Buddhist approach to our individual predicamants? Is there anything you would change?
What in your own life can you identify as lack projects and reality projects?
Next week we will look at how David sees our collective predicament in Buddhist terms.
Gassho
Kokuu
Here, David Loy points out that Buddhism has almost always been seen to apply to the awakening of individuals, rather than to see the greed, anger and ignorance present in social systems that causes suffering. He suggests that we need to focus more on this ‘social dukkha’.
He points out that just because the Buddha did not talk about climate change and other environmental issues, and was unaware of most of the basic understanding of science that we take for granted now, does not mean that these things cannot be part of a evolving Buddhist tradition.
Loy looks at the predicament of the individual in terms of Buddhist thought, and terms our seeking after external things into two groups:
1. Lack projects, which fill our sense of lack
2. Reality projects, which make us feel more real, and feed our ego
Questions for this week, and feel free also to respond to anything else in this section which speaks to you:
Do you think that Loy accurately summarises the Buddhist approach to our individual predicamants? Is there anything you would change?
What in your own life can you identify as lack projects and reality projects?
Next week we will look at how David sees our collective predicament in Buddhist terms.
Gassho
Kokuu
Comment