Hi All,
Let’s get into chapter 7, pages 118 through 129. We’ll learn about nuns who studied with male teachers, beginning with Chinese nun Miaodao and her teacher, Dahui. Some thoughts:
Once again we see that rules are (meant to be?) broken! The prohibitions against women and men practicing together were clear. Schireson credits the deep wisdom of the Teachers, and the dedication of the students, in disobeying “the letter of the Buddhist law while maintaining the spirit of bringing forth the Dharma.” In our times, it feels pretty easy to rationalize breaking old rules that we see as discriminatory. Where do you think the line is, when it comes to breaking the rules of Zen practice? When is it ok, and when is it not ok? How do you make these decisions in your own daily practice?
I was particularly touched by the description (page 124) of the teaching relationship of Dahui and Miaodao. Dahui helped Miaodao to see that her aspiration for practice was, in itself, something she could rely on in times of doubt or difficulty. If you’re here and reading this, you have this aspiration as well. How do you honor and care for bodhichitta as it arises in you? What do you rely on when practice is especially hard?
I love the way that Dahui’s wise insight into the undifferentiated nature of beings allows him to see that people of all natures can and should be trained, while at the same time acknowledging that the training must take into account the specific aspects of a persons life.
What did you like about this weeks reading? Or dislike? Did anything surprise you? Please share and discuss!
Note: we’re almost to the halfway point of the book this week, and next weeks reading will be a short one, so now is a great time to catch up, or to jump in if you’ve been wanting to! All are welcome.
Gassho
Byōkan
sat + lah
Let’s get into chapter 7, pages 118 through 129. We’ll learn about nuns who studied with male teachers, beginning with Chinese nun Miaodao and her teacher, Dahui. Some thoughts:
Once again we see that rules are (meant to be?) broken! The prohibitions against women and men practicing together were clear. Schireson credits the deep wisdom of the Teachers, and the dedication of the students, in disobeying “the letter of the Buddhist law while maintaining the spirit of bringing forth the Dharma.” In our times, it feels pretty easy to rationalize breaking old rules that we see as discriminatory. Where do you think the line is, when it comes to breaking the rules of Zen practice? When is it ok, and when is it not ok? How do you make these decisions in your own daily practice?
I was particularly touched by the description (page 124) of the teaching relationship of Dahui and Miaodao. Dahui helped Miaodao to see that her aspiration for practice was, in itself, something she could rely on in times of doubt or difficulty. If you’re here and reading this, you have this aspiration as well. How do you honor and care for bodhichitta as it arises in you? What do you rely on when practice is especially hard?
I love the way that Dahui’s wise insight into the undifferentiated nature of beings allows him to see that people of all natures can and should be trained, while at the same time acknowledging that the training must take into account the specific aspects of a persons life.
What did you like about this weeks reading? Or dislike? Did anything surprise you? Please share and discuss!
Note: we’re almost to the halfway point of the book this week, and next weeks reading will be a short one, so now is a great time to catch up, or to jump in if you’ve been wanting to! All are welcome.
Gassho
Byōkan
sat + lah
Comment