Dear Time-Keepers,
We will not spend a little time with Uji, Being-Time. In this essay, Dogen expresses his many visions of time(s).
First, a little Dogen 'MadLibs' (a children's game of filling in words into sentence):
I - Fill in appropriate and interesting words and images into the [ ] in the following opening paragraph:
An old master named Yaoshan said:
For the time being standing [at/in/on a place],
just being-time.
For the time being [doing an activity] [in an opposite kind of place], being-time.
For the time being [a bad or ugly thing], being-time.
For the time being [a good or beautiful thing], being-time.
For the time being [a tangible, ordinary concrete object close at hand], being-time.
For the time being [some other concrete object a bit farther away], being-time.
For the time being [some ordinary occupation or group of people], being-time.
For the time being [some grand aspect of nature], being-time.
In this word “being-time,” time is already just being, and
all being is time.
II - Briefly explain the meaning of "the things of the world stand unimpeded and unhindering in relation to all, in the same way that moment of time do not hinder other moments of time."
III - Briefly explain what Dogen criticizes as the ordinary view of time by common people in the first passage at the time of page 126 (the passage that begins, "Yet, common people do not understand ... ") compared to the wiser view that Dogen describes in the second paragraph (which beings, "But time is not merely this, ... ")
Gassho, J
stlah
PS - A careful reader has noted to me that I got my relativity wrong! On page 120, I noted that, by Special Relativity, time for the twin on the mountain top passes more slowly than for his brother in the valley. In fact, it is the opposite. The twin on the mountain is traveling faster than the lower twin as the planet rotates, however, "Even though velocity slows the aging of the mountain twin, gravity is stronger and thus slows the aging of the valley twin even more." Noted, and thank you. I am no physicist.
If I could, I would travel back in time and correct the manuscript!
We will not spend a little time with Uji, Being-Time. In this essay, Dogen expresses his many visions of time(s).
First, a little Dogen 'MadLibs' (a children's game of filling in words into sentence):
I - Fill in appropriate and interesting words and images into the [ ] in the following opening paragraph:
An old master named Yaoshan said:
For the time being standing [at/in/on a place],
just being-time.
For the time being [doing an activity] [in an opposite kind of place], being-time.
For the time being [a bad or ugly thing], being-time.
For the time being [a good or beautiful thing], being-time.
For the time being [a tangible, ordinary concrete object close at hand], being-time.
For the time being [some other concrete object a bit farther away], being-time.
For the time being [some ordinary occupation or group of people], being-time.
For the time being [some grand aspect of nature], being-time.
In this word “being-time,” time is already just being, and
all being is time.
II - Briefly explain the meaning of "the things of the world stand unimpeded and unhindering in relation to all, in the same way that moment of time do not hinder other moments of time."
III - Briefly explain what Dogen criticizes as the ordinary view of time by common people in the first passage at the time of page 126 (the passage that begins, "Yet, common people do not understand ... ") compared to the wiser view that Dogen describes in the second paragraph (which beings, "But time is not merely this, ... ")
Gassho, J
stlah
PS - A careful reader has noted to me that I got my relativity wrong! On page 120, I noted that, by Special Relativity, time for the twin on the mountain top passes more slowly than for his brother in the valley. In fact, it is the opposite. The twin on the mountain is traveling faster than the lower twin as the planet rotates, however, "Even though velocity slows the aging of the mountain twin, gravity is stronger and thus slows the aging of the valley twin even more." Noted, and thank you. I am no physicist.
If I could, I would travel back in time and correct the manuscript!



Comment