reMINDer: Our Next Book Selection: A New Buddhist Path by David Loy ... we will startlessly start that in a couple of weeks. Details HERE.
But for now ... Case 74 never ends, and so we concentrate on Case 75, Zuigan's Permanent Principle ...
This seems like a really dandy Koan to briefly turn from the Book of Serenity (we will come back sometime soon).
What is the permanent whatever that holds all together? It is moving and changing.
How can something moving and changing be called "permanent" then? Sometimes we do not recognize how timeless it is for all its passing time. How changeless is the change itself!
Anyway, we do not see it, yet the seen and seer are not two. It is always seen right before your very eyes (and is the eyes too).
The Master asks, "Do you agree?" (This is one of those 'damned if you do, damned if you don't' Zen guy questions). It is perhaps not a matter of agreeing or disagreeing, naming or not naming, mentally defining or not defining, for only then is one free of the senses and dust, life and death, even when buried up to one's neck in all life's dust!
The one caution I have about Shishin Wick's commentary is that some of the language may seem to point to Shikantaza as a form of deepened concentration in order to conduct some analysis or introspection about how the mind works and all the stuff that comes up. We naturally become aware of all the games of the "mind theatre" in Zazen, but it is not a matter of sitting there analyzing our psyche. I don't think he meant to imply that.
Anyway ... this is a Practice that pointlessly points (how can you point to something when it is the finger too?) to that which is real, permanent, solid ... that is also all human dreams and errors, changing impermence and as fluid as water or air. Don't try to nail it down, don't try to fix it into a set image, don't seek to label, rigidly categorize or know too much about it ... and you may have your best chance of knowing.
Gassho, J
SatToday
But for now ... Case 74 never ends, and so we concentrate on Case 75, Zuigan's Permanent Principle ...
This seems like a really dandy Koan to briefly turn from the Book of Serenity (we will come back sometime soon).
What is the permanent whatever that holds all together? It is moving and changing.
How can something moving and changing be called "permanent" then? Sometimes we do not recognize how timeless it is for all its passing time. How changeless is the change itself!
Anyway, we do not see it, yet the seen and seer are not two. It is always seen right before your very eyes (and is the eyes too).
The Master asks, "Do you agree?" (This is one of those 'damned if you do, damned if you don't' Zen guy questions). It is perhaps not a matter of agreeing or disagreeing, naming or not naming, mentally defining or not defining, for only then is one free of the senses and dust, life and death, even when buried up to one's neck in all life's dust!
The one caution I have about Shishin Wick's commentary is that some of the language may seem to point to Shikantaza as a form of deepened concentration in order to conduct some analysis or introspection about how the mind works and all the stuff that comes up. We naturally become aware of all the games of the "mind theatre" in Zazen, but it is not a matter of sitting there analyzing our psyche. I don't think he meant to imply that.
Anyway ... this is a Practice that pointlessly points (how can you point to something when it is the finger too?) to that which is real, permanent, solid ... that is also all human dreams and errors, changing impermence and as fluid as water or air. Don't try to nail it down, don't try to fix it into a set image, don't seek to label, rigidly categorize or know too much about it ... and you may have your best chance of knowing.
Gassho, J
SatToday
Comment