Re: SIT-A-LONG with JUNDO: Knocking Down Monastery Walls
I have been reading some history of the Soto lineage by T. Griffith Foulk, and came across some interesting points he made regarding the devolving of the sotoshu into a largely funerary organization in Japan. He makes the case that, throughout history, one of the most important functions of religion is dealing with the dead, ushering them into the afterlife/whatever, helping the survivors to cope, and so on.
However, Shakyamuni Buddha never covered this area, i.e. no elaborate instructions on funeral ceremonies, etc covering the above. Foulks argues that this alone may explain why Buddhism largely disappeared in India, or became mixed in with the native Hinduism, which of course did cover the handling of the dead elaborately.
Now, he then argues that it may be the very "devolved" function of performing rites/funerals that has in fact kept Zen Buddhism alive and functioning in Japan, even if not in a way that the early ancestors/patriarchs might have liked. Might Zen disappear entirely from Japan without this service, and furthermore, should Western Zen involve itself more in such things to sustain longevity?
Is there merit to this argument? (and sorry if this has been covered before...)
Main source: http://hcbss.stanford.edu/research/proj ... foulk.html
I have been reading some history of the Soto lineage by T. Griffith Foulk, and came across some interesting points he made regarding the devolving of the sotoshu into a largely funerary organization in Japan. He makes the case that, throughout history, one of the most important functions of religion is dealing with the dead, ushering them into the afterlife/whatever, helping the survivors to cope, and so on.
However, Shakyamuni Buddha never covered this area, i.e. no elaborate instructions on funeral ceremonies, etc covering the above. Foulks argues that this alone may explain why Buddhism largely disappeared in India, or became mixed in with the native Hinduism, which of course did cover the handling of the dead elaborately.
Now, he then argues that it may be the very "devolved" function of performing rites/funerals that has in fact kept Zen Buddhism alive and functioning in Japan, even if not in a way that the early ancestors/patriarchs might have liked. Might Zen disappear entirely from Japan without this service, and furthermore, should Western Zen involve itself more in such things to sustain longevity?
Is there merit to this argument? (and sorry if this has been covered before...)
Main source: http://hcbss.stanford.edu/research/proj ... foulk.html
Comment