The more I read and think about this stuff, it seems to me like we’re trying to cram too much into the “priest” label. Obviously, if you’re going to lead a sesshin, it would be helpful to have attended a sesshin or two. But leading a sesshin is not the only way to teach the Dharma. We need more lay teachers who are fully ordained, with dharma transmission. Dharma transmission needs to be decoupled from monasticism. That way we can open up this tradition to accept new ideas, to help new folks who have been left behind in the past, while still having monks maintaining the traditions we’ve been practicing for 1000 years. Or 2500 years, depending on what you’re counting.
Let’s let priests handle the churchy stuff, and teachers focus on teaching.
This seems to be kind of similar to the way Therevadin Buddhism is developing in the West. Most of the American teachers I’m familiar with are not priests or monks, but lay practicitioners who have been empowered to teach. The monks run their temples, the lay folks run their centers, and there seems to be room for everybody.
[emoji120], Zenmei (sat)
Let’s let priests handle the churchy stuff, and teachers focus on teaching.
This seems to be kind of similar to the way Therevadin Buddhism is developing in the West. Most of the American teachers I’m familiar with are not priests or monks, but lay practicitioners who have been empowered to teach. The monks run their temples, the lay folks run their centers, and there seems to be room for everybody.
[emoji120], Zenmei (sat)
Comment