If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
The Mormon church has conferences twice a year where the leaders of the church give talks in five two-hour sessions over the course of two days. Invariably, in recent years, outside the conference center here in Salt Lake City, protesters can be seen desecrating what Mormon's consider to be sacred garments (basically underwear, but with religious significance of the highest and most sacred kind).
In my opinion, while such desecration is incredibly rude and offensive (which, I'm sure, is why the protesters do it), the garments are just bits of fabric. They become sacred not because of what they are, but because of what believing people bring to them. The same is true with other religious symbols. I grew up Roman Catholic, and we genuflected before a crucifix each time we went into church, preferably with a bit of holy water on our fingers. But, is the crucifix sacred, in and of itself? No. If you were to see one burning in a bonfire, would it be Christ himself burning? No. It's a statement of someone's beliefs, but there's nothing sacred about the object, per se.
This idea is common in Buddhism, where worship or reverence or attachment to a Buddha statue, or to the idea of the Buddha, at some point will become a hindrance. Same with flag-burning. It's considered bad form to let the US flag touch the ground, but apparently not considered bad form to let any other flag touch the ground. Burning flags is illegal, isn't it? These are really statements about how people are expected to feel about some idea (God, country, religion, etc), not about the significance of any particular object. If I were freezing, I would burn a wooden Buddha statue (or crucifix or set of garments) in a heartbeat. If I had just crawled in from the desert, I'd drink the whole bowl of holy water. Then, after I'd saved myself from freezing or dehydration, I'd probably be killed by all the religious adherents I'd just offended...
I went in to a furniture store the other day and saw a whole wall of wooden crosses of different sizes and colors. Apparently, according to the salesperson, crosses are in vogue in decorating homes these days (Christian or not).
thanks for all the replies.
So many things I didn't realise and the god jezus robots are just weird!
Its strange how religions can become such a fashionstatement....
In Switzerland there was a shop with a Buddha statue outside (see picture below).
Apparently a vacationing family from India got really bent out of shape because the store owner hung a pair of shoes around Buddha's neck.
(It was a shoe store...)
For whatever it's worth, the "garlanding of shoes" is a way of publicly shaming someone in India.
(Similar to a "scarlet letter" or a dunce cap)
When we respond in anger to the "desecration" of an idol, facsimile or effigy are we really following the Buddha's way?
When I see Buddha statues for sale, it makes me laugh a little inside. I think, "that's not Buddha", "that's not my Buddha (as if I could have one!)" but others may think the opposites. Buddhism cannot be created nor destroyed. It's always been there and won't abandon anyone. I think it's best to brush aside those that slander you or things that "belong" to you. Although I come to this website and I meditate regularly, I also leave "Buddhism" behind and just live my life. So, when I see a representation of Buddha in whatever way it is being treated, it makes me laugh a little inside. Buddha is in you, at the core radiating outward... (well that's how I view it, when i view it). Everyone has it and material representations cannot even come close to touching it. So, I guess there are billions of Buddha's walking about, perhaps we should worry more about the living ones than the manufactured ones. I will say (have said?) that these statues, pictures, etc. have a good side, no matter how they are used. First, they are a quick and effective means to bring Buddha into the mind of whoever perceives such a thing. It's possibly a tiny, tiny, tiny beginning of something great. Second, they can remind us (just me? OMG :lol: ) that superficial things, whatever, should not be overvalued and should be abandoned when the show is over.
Yeah it's cool, it's funny, "That's a Buddha? Who's Buddha?", but hey, what's next?
You know, I was going to be all "Zen" and quote the Shobogenzo Zuimonki:
One day Dogen said,
In the Zoku-kosoden there’s a story about a monk in the assembly of a certain Zen master. The monk worshipped a golden image of the Buddha as well as the relics of the Buddha. Even in the dormitory, he constantly burned incense and prostrated himself before them, honoring and making offerings.
One day, the master said to the monk, “The image and relics of the Buddha which you worship will eventually be harmful to you.”
A little more on the "God-Jesus" robot ... it apparently is a fortune telling toy ...
Here is a translation of the side of the box ...
and some information on it ...
The God-Jesus was a toy made by large famous Japanese toy manufacturer Bandai and was released in 1985 when the future and Robots were the coolest topic around. However, one can but wonder what made the Japanese designers name it "God-Jesus" and stick a cross in its hand.
The toy is little of a rarity but not impossible to get your hands on (as proven by me) since it does show up from time to time on Japanese auction sites for reasonable sums of money (around US$30). You know you want one!
I should add that many Japanese were up in arms, and had pulled from the shelves, a chocolate candy sold here ... called "Buddha Snot" ...
The package says ":Boogers from the nose of the Lord Buddha", and it was apparently sold at the gift shops near one of the most famous Buddhist temples in Japan.
The Telegraph reports that priests at one of Japan's most famous temples have taken steps to block the sale of a sweet marketed as the "Snot from the nose of the Great Buddha". They have prevented the name being registered as a trade mark office, but have been unable to stop vendors selling the sweets to hordes of tourists who flock to see the giant Buddha in the ancient capital, Nara, in western Japan. Yamamoto Bussan, the company that launched the sweet three years ago, has said that in a recession a product name needs to make a strong impact. A spokesman said some employees had doubts about the name, so it was decided to attach the ultra-polite suffix sama to Buddha's name. But the sweet's packaging shows an irreverent picture of Buddha picking his nose.
I suppose is has something to do with where you stand ...
Of course, here in Japan ... and in much of the rest of Asia ... many folks do buy pseudo-Christian and Jewish objects (crucifix pendants, Jewish Star of David earings) because they are considered fashion or trendy (not for any religious meaning).
Our town has several faux-churches which are wedding halls ("Christian" weddings are trendy ... although the people are not interested in the religious meaning at all ... they just like the image of a "church wedding"), staffed by fake "priests" ... here is a guy who seems to be running a seminar for foreigners who want to break into the wedding business ...
The difference seems that buddhas get sold as a novelty item, whereas selling anything Christian is considered a religious object. I don't know, do Buddhists buy crucfixes as novelties? Maybe so. But I think Christians would be very upset if they thought people were buying crucifuxes as objects stripped of their religious significance. Buddhists, being buddhas, don't seem to care as much about this. Of course, Christians are buddhas, too, but their orientation to the world and items associated with their religion is different.
Leave a comment:
Guest replied
Re: Selling Buddha
Hi Vera,
To be perfectly honest I really do not see much wrong with it. In fact I have seen statues or depictions of Jesus being sold everywhere around here. The way I look at it is that a statue is just a statue. A figure just a figure. If someone enjoys looking at a statue of Buddha then that is fine, but they could just easily look at a tree, rock, a pile of trash, a crying baby, or a mirror to see Buddha too.
Leave a comment: