There is less to say from this talk as I feel that, being inside a Soto Zen sangha, we have a reasonable general knowledge of a lot of this.
I will therefore limit my observations to what seemed new to me + a link to the overall talk. As a Pureland practitioner and academic within the Pureland training system, Michael happily admitted that he was talking as an outsider.
Rinzai Zen - he questioned strongly the general idea that Eisei founded Rinzai in Japan. He was happy with the idea that he founded an important lineage rooted in Kenninji, but he was one of many. He pointed out that Kenninji doesn't refer to him as Eisei but as Yosai, so there isn't even agreement on his name. Rinzai didn't produce a biography of him similar to those printed by Soto and Nichiren. [My comment - during the Meiji Reforms Buddhist sects were told to name their single founder (their Jesus) and founding text (their bible) in order to appear respectable to Westerners, so Rinzai picked on Eisei.]
Soto Zen - Just one comment felt novel - that Dogen was a physically weak and sickly individual. That's why he didn't leave the ship on arrival in China - he needed to recover. It's also why he died so young. The following are the ages at death of the main Kamakura Buddhist leaders: Shinran 90, Hōnen 80, Eisai 75, Nichiren 61, Dōgen 54 & Ippen 51. In Ippen's case, his chosen itinerant life was basically that of an Indian style wandering monk living on alms. In the Japanese climate, that's a major strain on the body - Japan is NOT the tropical clmiate of India and goes well below freezing in winter.
Nichiren - an astonishingly confrontational style that seems an aberration in Japanese society.
General - none of the Kamakura Buddhisms (except some types of Pureland) were numerically successful during the founders lifetimes.
Bows
Hoshuku
Satlah
I will therefore limit my observations to what seemed new to me + a link to the overall talk. As a Pureland practitioner and academic within the Pureland training system, Michael happily admitted that he was talking as an outsider.
Rinzai Zen - he questioned strongly the general idea that Eisei founded Rinzai in Japan. He was happy with the idea that he founded an important lineage rooted in Kenninji, but he was one of many. He pointed out that Kenninji doesn't refer to him as Eisei but as Yosai, so there isn't even agreement on his name. Rinzai didn't produce a biography of him similar to those printed by Soto and Nichiren. [My comment - during the Meiji Reforms Buddhist sects were told to name their single founder (their Jesus) and founding text (their bible) in order to appear respectable to Westerners, so Rinzai picked on Eisei.]
Soto Zen - Just one comment felt novel - that Dogen was a physically weak and sickly individual. That's why he didn't leave the ship on arrival in China - he needed to recover. It's also why he died so young. The following are the ages at death of the main Kamakura Buddhist leaders: Shinran 90, Hōnen 80, Eisai 75, Nichiren 61, Dōgen 54 & Ippen 51. In Ippen's case, his chosen itinerant life was basically that of an Indian style wandering monk living on alms. In the Japanese climate, that's a major strain on the body - Japan is NOT the tropical clmiate of India and goes well below freezing in winter.
Nichiren - an astonishingly confrontational style that seems an aberration in Japanese society.
General - none of the Kamakura Buddhisms (except some types of Pureland) were numerically successful during the founders lifetimes.
Bows
Hoshuku
Satlah

Comment