Siddhis, or supernormal powers, are acknowledged in early Buddhist texts as potential byproducts of deep meditative absorption, with the Buddha describing abilities such as telepathy, levitation, and past-life recall though he also noted these occur “only in the mind of the one who practices,” implying a subjective or internal reality.
Zen teachers often go further, actively dismissing or warning against interest in siddhis, treating them as distractions that inflate the ego and derail the path to awakening. Yet this repeated caution raises a curious question: has anyone actually had experience with siddhis? If they truly didn’t exist, why has so much effort been spent urging people not to pursue them? The intensity of the warnings across traditions ironically lends weight to the idea that these experiences do happen but are simply not to be clung to or mistaken for enlightenment itself.
I tend to agree that if they do exist, they’re probably a distraction but then again, what’s wrong with a little distraction once in a while? Maybe the real problem isn’t distraction itself, but failing to return. And in an age dominated by secularism and scientific materialism, siddhis have been largely dismissed as fantasy or metaphor. But maybe this very dismissal is why we should take another look. So if one did want to learn or develop siddhis and investigate what all the fuss is about, how should one proceed?
Sat LAH
Gassho
Niall
Zen teachers often go further, actively dismissing or warning against interest in siddhis, treating them as distractions that inflate the ego and derail the path to awakening. Yet this repeated caution raises a curious question: has anyone actually had experience with siddhis? If they truly didn’t exist, why has so much effort been spent urging people not to pursue them? The intensity of the warnings across traditions ironically lends weight to the idea that these experiences do happen but are simply not to be clung to or mistaken for enlightenment itself.
I tend to agree that if they do exist, they’re probably a distraction but then again, what’s wrong with a little distraction once in a while? Maybe the real problem isn’t distraction itself, but failing to return. And in an age dominated by secularism and scientific materialism, siddhis have been largely dismissed as fantasy or metaphor. But maybe this very dismissal is why we should take another look. So if one did want to learn or develop siddhis and investigate what all the fuss is about, how should one proceed?
Sat LAH
Gassho
Niall
Comment